Wednesday, December 14, 2011

The Rockefellers and the One World Government, One World Religion And The Laws That Are Already In Place Against Freedom of Religion And The Noahide Laws

In 1962 Nelson Rockefeller wrote The Future of Federalism. He stated that current events demand a new world order.
 "but the nation-state is becoming less and less competent to perform its international political tasks...These are some of the reasons pressing us to lead vigorously toward the true building of a new world order...Sooner perhaps than we may realize...there will evolve the bases for a federal structure of the free world."(Nelson Rockefeller at Harvard University).

 As you read the following quotes you will see that an organized effort has been and is being made to establish a One World Government. They want to control what we believe and how we feel. They have no problem with forcing population control and brainwashing us through the media. They intend to establish a One World Religion as part of this agenda. If you have a faith that you practice this should concern you. If you are atheist or agnostic, you should not be happy at the prospect of having a religion forced upon you by government. This is not just some crackpot conspiracy theory. This is direct quotes from those involved and is now a part of documented history.

 The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization exists for the sole purpose of just such mind control.

 The first director -general of UNESCO (1946-48) was Sir Julian Huxley, an ardent defender of Darwin's evolution, and who wrote the 1948, "UNESCO: Its Purpose and Its Philosophy." He calls for the abolition of national sovereignty, the use of media propaganda to indoctrinate us, and a eugenics program.
 "The general philosophy of UNESCO should be a scientific world humanism, global in extent and evolutionary in background...its education program it can stress the ultimate need for world political unity and familiarize all peoples with the implications of the transfer of full sovereignty from separate nations to a world organization...Political unification in some sort of world government will be required...Tasks for the media division of UNESCO (will be) to promote the growth of a common outlook shared by all nations and cultures...to help the emergence of a single world culture....Even though it is quite true that any radical eugenic policy will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care, and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable." (http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0006/000681/068197eo.pdf)

 In her Universal Theocratic State, Edith Roosevelt wrote in 1962, "Curriculum is being drafted to indoctrinate our children in what "John D. Rockefeller Jr. calls 'the church of all people.'...Plans are being made to set up regional World Universities whose objectives would include 'to instruct in all religions but will not make religion it's aim,' 'build a world outlook' and teach the physiological , psychological and spiritual aspect of sex.'...

 July 31, 1962 Dwight D. Eisenhower gave his support for a World University to provide 'World Thinkers' to funnel into the United Nations....Defense Secretary Robert S. McNamara is a sponsor of the Temple of Understanding, the $5,000,000 "Spiritual UN' for the six major faiths...UN official lecture at meetings of the Arcane School, the international 'group of New World Servers', who form 'Triangles' to work for UNESCO." These were established by occultist Alice Bailey's Lucis Trust, which was to be affiliated with the U.N. Meditation Room.

 In 1969 Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary was founded, Billy Graham was Chairman Emeritus of it. Mary French Rockefeller was a trustee. Laurence Rockefeller is responsible for funding The Human Potential Foundation,based in Falls Church, Virginia, which specialises in mind control on a global scale.

 The Complimentary & Alternative Medicine Program at Stanford in partnership with Vicus.com is establishing a database of citations, abstracts and articles that were donated by one of the founders of Esalen Institute in 1997, through Laurence Rockefeller. Esalen is a freaky place.

 Everyone knows that during the Cold War both the U.S. and the Soviet Union participated in paranormal experiments. Esalen has exchanged information with them. Esalen is involved in paraspychology, self-actualization, self-hypnosis, with similar techniques of manipulation and mind-control as Tavistock. Esalen's activities include psychological manipulation to solve political problems.

 The Esalen Institute The Esalen Institute claims on their website to be associated with Aldous Huxley.

 "The Esalen Institute was founded in 1962 as an alternative educational center devoted to the exploration of what Aldous Huxley called the "human potential," the world of unrealized human capacities that lies beyond the imagination. Esalen soon became known for its blend of East/West philosophies, its experiential/didactic workshops, the steady influx of philosophers, psychologists, artists, and religious thinkers, and its breathtaking grounds blessed with natural hot springs. Once home to a Native American tribe known as the Essalen. Esalen is situated on 27 acres of spectacular Big Sur coastline with the Santa Lucia Mountains rising sharply behind."

 "We would like those people who are planning their first visit to Esalen to know that swimsuits are optional, and nudity common, in the hot springs massage area, and swimming pool. We encourage each individual to choose what is most comfortable, either wearing a swimsuit or not, and emphasize that the environment we strive for at Esalen is one of personal sanctuary and respect for the human body."

 It is interesting to note that spending time there can get you college credit. "Many formal educational institutions recognize the time spent at Esalen as being worthy of credit in their own curricula; check with your university or college. We would be glad to supply information to your school regarding any of our programs or series of programs." "Esalen is a provider of continuing education credits for nurses, psychologists, MFCCs, LCSWs, massage practitioners and bodyworkers." http://www.esalen.org/info/general.html

Aldous Huxley

 Aldous Huxley is a well known counter culture figure and he is the brother of Julian Huxley from UNESCO, mentioned above. In 1932 he wrote Brave New World, a novel which was about a future society that was collectivist (a polite word for Socialism and Communism), and the methods that this society used for control. The book turned out to be prophetic, as many of the things he wrote about are now part of our world. He also wrote screenplays for Hollywood, which means that his ideas have become part of our pop-culture. Aldous and his brother were the grandsons of T.H. Huxley, who declared himself to be Darwin’s bulldog, so strong was his support of Darwin’s theories. T.H. Huxley coined the term agnostic.

 In 1954, he published Doors of Perception, which was about drug use to expand the mind. It is said that he had himself injected with LSD when he was dying, and was high on it, when he slipped into a coma that he never awoke from. For Further Reading on the Rockefellers and Esalen, Esalen: America and the religion of no religion - Jeffrey John Kripal - 2007 and The New York Times, Sex, Drugs and Hot Tubs, 2007, http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/06/books/review/Johnson.t.html

 The American Baptist Publication Society, in 1919 published "The New World Order" by Samuel Zane Batten. Batten declares, "...the new world rises upon our vision....We have vindicated the right of social control....There must be developed a national spirit of service....The natural resources of the nation must be socialized...The state must socialize every group...Men must learn to have world patriotism. World patriotism must be a faith....There is no more justice for the claim of absolute sovereignty on the part of a nation than on the part of an individual....The only alternative is World Federation...with a world parliament, an international court, and an international policy force...Men must have an international mind before there can be a world federation. They mustsee and affirm that above the nation is humanity. Internationalism must first be a religion before it can be a reality and a system." (http://books.google.com/books/about/The_new_world_order.html?id=780LAAAAYAAJ) (http://www.infowars.com/samuel-z-batten-the-new-world-order-1919/)

 The Temple of Understanding

 John D. Rockefeller was a prominent member. The Rockefeller family funded Baptist organizations that taught more liberal theology. The Temple of Understanding collaborated with the Global Commission of Parliamentarian Leaders in 1985 and gave birth to the Global Forum. “…New Age organizations behind the Global Forum just happen to be the Temple of Understanding, which is closely tied to the United Nations and is housed at Madeleine L’Engle’s church, the Cathedral of St. John the Divine…The Temple’s purpose…is to facilitate the one world religion, through the promoting both the acceptance and the embrace of all religions, beliefs and rituals.” http://www.google.com/urlsa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CB0QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.seekgod.ca%2Frenovare.htm&ei=jn7pTvuqEoOrgweih_z6CA&usg=AFQjCNGJrDMN8tx91vA_mxIT9uDM2o80pg

 “According to the Temple of Understanding’s own literature, it is the world’s second oldest international interfaith organization, just behind the World Congress of Faith’s, founded in England in 1935…The Temple began through the efforts of …”Founding Friends,” including world leaders Eleanor Roosevelt, Albert Schweitzer, Thomas Merton, the Dalai Lama, U Thant, Pope John XXIII, Pope Paul VI…” (http://www.templeofunderstanding.org/wwa_written_history.html)

 “The “Friends” assisted the founder, Juliet Hollister...in establishing a world interfaith center based in the U.S. Additional sponsors have included John D. Rockefeller II, Margaret Sanger...International Planned Parenthood...Bishop James A. Pike...the Society of Friends(Quakers), the Jewish Theological Seminary, the Unitarian Fellowship...” http://www.seekgod.ca/rockefeller.htm

 The Rockefeller Foundation has donated to both Rand and the League for Industrial Democracy. Despite it’s name, the League is not a Democratic organization. Until 1921, it was called the Intercollegiate Socialist Society, with obvious Marxist ideology. It was organized by Upton Sinclair, Jack London, Clarence Darrow, and it’s president in 1935 was John Dewey. It has also had directors that claim to be anti-communist like Jeane Kirkpatrick and Sidney Hook. It’s headquarters was the Rand School of Social Science. http://www.seekgod.ca/rockefeller.htm

Lindisfarne Center

 The United Nations has a meditation leader named Sri Chinmoy, who said, “The United Nations is the chosen instrument of God; to be a chosen instrument means to be a divine messenger carrying the banner of God’s inner vision and outer manifestation. One day the world will... treasure and cherish the soul of the United Nations as its very own with enormous pride, for this soul is all-loving, all-nourishing, and all-fulfilling”. (http://www.srichinmoylibrary.com/books/0015/3/13)

 William Irwin Thompson is the founder of the Lindisfarne Center. He said, "We have now a new spirituality, what has been called the New Age movement. The planetization of the esoteric has been going on for some time... This is now beginning to influence concepts of politics and community in ecology... This is the Gaia [Mother Earth] politique... planetary culture.” and “the independent sovereign state, with the sovereign individual in his private property, [is] over, just as the Christian fundamentalist days are about to be over." (http://www.williamirwinthompson.org/lindisfarne/pilgrimagetolindisfarne.html)

 The Lindisfame Center is in Manhattan's Episcopal Cathedral of Saint John The Divine. It is funded by the Rockefeller Foundation, the Lilly Endowment, and the Rockefeller Brothers Fund. Maurice Stong is it's financial director and sitson the Board of Directors. He is also the director of the Aspen Institute, co-founded by Aldous Huxley. Strong is a Canadian, not an American.

 He is also:
 1.Senior Advisor to UN Secretary General Kofi Annan
2.Senior Advisor to World Bank President James Wolfensohn
3.Chairman of the Earth Council
4.Chairman of the World Resources Institute
5.Co-Chairman of the Council of the World Economic Forum member of Toyota’s International Advisory Board Strong is also a member of the Club of Rome, which is another Rockefeller created entity, which began at at the Rockefeller’s estate at Bellagio, Italy.(Coffman, Michael, Rescuing a Broken America :Why America is Deeply Divided and How to Heal it Constitutionally, 2010, pg. 115; http://books.google.com/booksid=yRg1TpgIWZAC&pg=PA115&dq=club+of+rome+rockefeller&hl=en&ei=SiTlTuqRE8fG0AHF8ZSABg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=4&ved=0CEMQ6AEwAw)

 Among the members of the Lindisfame Center is David Spangler, who said, "Lucifer, like Christ, stands at the door of man’s consciousness and knocks. If man says, “Go away because I do not like what you represent, I am afraid of you,” Lucifer will play tricks on that fellow.(Lawrence, Ronald J. The Marxist Goliath Amongst Us, 2010, pg. 232; http://books.google.com/booksid=6b21I9_RErMC&pg=PA232&dq=Lucifer,+like+Christ,+stands+at+the+door+of+man%E2%80%99s+consciousness+and+knocks&hl=en&ei=JDfNTq_BOeT50gGv1NVn&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CDoQ6AEwAQ)

 “If man says, “Come in, and I will give to you the treat of my love and understanding and I will uplift you in the light and presence of the Christ, my outflow,” then Lucifer becomes something else again. He becomes the being who carries that great treat, the ultimate treat, the light of wisdom..."

 Also housed at the Cathedral of St. John the Divine, is the Temple of Understanding. It was founded by the Lucis Trust(http://www.lucistrust.org/) connected to Alice Bailey. It is supposed to be the spiritual counterpart to the United Nations.
 It's founders include:
 John D. Rockefeller IV
then-Secretary of Defense Robert S. McNamara
Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger
IBM president Thomas J. Watson
Socialist Party leader Norman Thomas
Eleanor Roosevelt
Time-Life president James A. Linen
author Christopher Isherwood
columnist Max Lerner
entertainer Jack Benny

 It works with the UN Secretariat, The World Council of Churches, the World Conference on Religion and Peace, and the World Parliament of Religions.

 The Bahai World Faith has Maurice Strong as a member. It's international headquarters is in Haifa, Israel. It has a strong influence in the UN, which has recognized it as an international non-government organization since 1948. They were granted consultant status on he UN Economic and Social Council and UNICEF. They work with the WHO and the UN Environmental Program.

 In addition to all of his "activities", Maurice Strong has some pretty strange ideas. He and his wife bought the Colorado Land and Cattle Company, from Saudi arms dealer Adnan Khashoggi. This amounts to a tract of land that covers 200,000 acres of San Luis Valley in Colorado. They named it "Baca" and it is also known as the "Valley of the Refuge Of World Truths." The Aspen Institute and the Lindisfame Association have operations there. There are monasteries, Ashram, a Vedic Temple, and Native American shamans, a Hindu temple, a ziggurat, and a Zen Buddist center. He supposedly bought it because a mystic told him and his wife that the ranch “would become the center for a new planetary order which would evolve from the economic collapse and environmental catastrophes that would sweep the globe in the years to come.” (Bell, Larry, Climate of Corruption:Politics and Power Behind The Global Warming Hoax, 2011, pg. 101)

 On the advice of her astrologer, Shirley MacLaine decided to move there and build a New Age study center. She wrote in her book, Aging and Saging, "There are those who feel we are into the 'Shift of the Ages' . . . The shift is supposed to occur somewhere between the 1980s and through 2012 . . . I feel all of this is happening now . . . Our solar system passes through this Photon Light particles every twenty-six thousand years. Apparently we entered this belt in the early 1980s and will be going through it for a thousand years . . . The photon energy frequencies accelerate everything. They accelerate understanding, awareness, self-knowledge . . . they also accelerate confusion, chaos, anger, and negativity. I believe that is what is accelerating. We are having a healing crisis. When that crisis subsides, I believe we will begin emotionally to feel that we are all one and that we are divine as well. Because of this crisis . . . karmic issues will be resolved. We will go through a healing process which will also be extremely painful because we will be detoxing . . . ". . . in effect, every twenty-six thousand years the build up of emotional and karmic toxins is cleared. . . I call it Karma-geddon. Instead of Armageddon, a Karma-geddon will be occurring which will be the resolution of all our karmic issues down through the ages. Therefore . . . the world will shed the old ways of living . . ."

 The Baca is reportedly a hot spot for paranormal activity and UFO's.

 In 1990, West Magazine, Alberta Canada conducted an interview titled, The Wizard of the Baca Grande, he proposed writing a novel in which a group decides,
 "The rich countries won’t do it. They won’t change. So, in order to save the planet, the group decides: isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?"

 Keeping in mind that Maurice Strong is connected to the Rockefellers, we move on to the UN Conference on Environment and Development. Strong was it's Secretary General. In June of 1992, UNCED held an Earth Summit in Brazil aimed at establishing an Earth Charter. They did not succeed but Agenda 21 was adopted.

 “The real goal of the Earth Charter is that it will in fact become like the Ten Commandments.” Maurice Strong. Time Magazine did a story on the Earth Summit. The night before they paid homage to the "Female Planet, until Dawn.

 In the morning they followed a Brazilian priestest to the edge of the water on Leme Beach, where they offered flowers and fruits to the Voodoo mother goddess of the sea, whose counterpart in Western mythology is Aphrodite/Venus. The UN is supposed to be about politics, but under that guise, they are promoting a New Age, One World Religion, with a pagan basis.

 It is ironic that Strong should be associated with any Environmental organizations. According to Climate of Corruption, he intended to pipe water into the desert Southwest, but environmentalists protested. He settled with the water company for $1.2 Million dollars and retained the rights to the water. He was also caught up in the UN “Food for Oil” scandal.

 He has also been largely involved in the “green movement” and the “sustainable environment.” Strong wrote the introduction to Beyond Interdependence: The Meshing of the World's Economy and the Earth's Ecology, which was published in 1992 by the Trilateral Commission, a private organization founded by David Rockefeller, Chairman of the UN Council on Human Relations in 1973. In that introduction Strong boasts, "This book couldn't appear at a better time, with the preparation for the Earth Summit moving into gear...it will help guide decisions that will literally determine the fate of the Earth...Rio will have the political capacity to produce the basic changes needed in our international economic agendas and in our institutions of governance."

 He also said, "We may get to the point that the only way of saving the world will be for industrial civilization to collapse."(Climate of Corruption)

 The Noahide Laws

 You may not be aware that there are already laws on the books that require us to return to a time before the Ten Commandments. They are called the Noahide Laws.

 The U.S. Congress officially recognized the Noahide Laws in legislation that was passed by both houses. Congress and the President of the U. S., George Bush, indicated in Public Law 102-14, 102nd Congress, that the United States of America was founded upon the Seven Universal Laws of Noah, and that these Laws have been the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization. They also acknowledged that the Seven Laws of Noah are the foundation upon which civilization stands and that recent weakening of these principles threaten the fabric of civilized society, and that justified preoccupation in educating the Citizens of the U.S. of America and future generations is needed. For this purpose, this Public Law designated March 26, 1991 as Education Day.”

(Wheeler, Cisco, Behold a White Horse, 2009, pg. 319; http://books.google.com/books?id=ml3yrwwhXKoC&pg=PA319&lpg=PA319&dq=The+U.S.+Congress+officially+recognized+the+Noahide+Laws+in+legislation+that+was+passed+by+both+houses&source=bl&ots=lUJhU3btB&sig=229OCIufpq36kSM35_fUNseXcs&hl=en&ei=xDjNTuyeFqPv0gGCjJz6Dw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5&ved=0CDcQ6AEwBDgU)

 "This obligation, to teach all the peoples of the earth about the Laws of Noah, is incumbent upon every individual in every era" -- (Mishnah Torah, Law of Kings 8:10).

 In Israel, there is a community of people called Druze. “In January 2004, the spiritual leader of the Druze community in Israel, Sheikh Mowafak Tarif, signed a declaration calling on all non-Jews in Israel to observe the Noahide Laws as laid down in the Hebrew Bible and expounded upon in Jewish tradition. The mayor of the Galilean city of Shefa-'Amr (Shfaram) - where Muslim, Christian and Druze communities live side by side - also signed the document. The declaration includes the commitment to make a better, more humane world based on the Seven Noahide Commandments and the values they represent commanded by the Creator to all mankind through Moses on Sinai. Support for the spread of the Seven Noahide Commandments by the Druze leaders reflects the Biblical narrative itself. The Druze community reveres the non-Jewish father-in-law of Moses, Jethro, whom Arabs call Shoaib. According to the Biblical narrative, Jethro joined and assisted the Jewish people in the desert during the Exodus, accepted monotheism, but ultimately rejoined his own people. In fact, the tomb of Jethro in Tiberias is the most important religious site for the Druze community.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Laws_of_Noah

 It is debatable whether or not Jethro worshipped Yahweh. The Midianites were ordered to be destroyed by Moses. Even the male children and the women who were not virgins were ordered to be killed because they led the Israelites astray with their religion. Moses would have known whether or not his father worshipped Yahweh or some other gods. The Koran says that the Midianites were warned by the prophets to repent and that they were among the Cities of the Plain that Lot preached to, trying to get them to stop being so wicked.

 “Gentiles May Not Be Taught the Torah. Inasmuch as the Jews had their own distinct jurisdiction, it would have been unwise to reveal their laws to the Gentiles, for such knowledge might have operated against the Jews in their opponents' courts. Hence the Talmud prohibited the teaching to a Gentile of the Torah, "the inheritance of the congregation of Jacob" (Deut. xxxiii. 4). R. Johanan says of one such teaching: "Such a person deserves death" (an idiom used to express indignation). "It is like placing an obstacle before the blind" (Sanh. 59a; ‘ag. 13a). Yet if a Gentile studies the Law for the purpose of observing the moral laws of Noah, R. Meïr says he is as good as a high priest, and quotes: "Ye shall therefore keep my statutes, and my judgments, which if a man do, he shall live in them" (Lev. xviii. 5). The text does not specify an Israelite or a Levite or a priest, but simply "a man"—even a Gentile ('Ab. Zarah 26a). Resh La’ish (d. 278) said, "A Gentile observing the Sabbath deserves death" (Sanh. 58b).

 This refers to a Gentile who accepted the seven laws of the Noahide, inasmuch as "the Sabbath is a sign between God and Israel alone," and it was probably directed against the Christian Jews, who disregarded the Mosaic laws and yet at that time kept up the observance of the Jewish Sabbath.”

 “Rabbina, who lived about 150 years after the Christians had changed the day of rest to Sunday, could not quite understand the principle underlying Resh La’ish's law, and, commenting upon it, added: "not even on Mondays [is the Gentile allowed to rest]"; intimating that the mandate given to the Noahide that "day and night shall not cease" = "have no rest "should be taken in a literal sense (Gen. viii. 22)—probably to discourage general idleness (ib.Rashi), or for the more plausible reason advanced by Maimonides, who says: "The principle is, one is not permitted to make innovations in religion or to create new commandments. He has the privilege to become a true proselyte by accepting the whole Law" ("Yad," Melakim, x. 9). R. Emden, in a remarkable apology for Christianity contained in his appendix to "Seder 'Olam"(pp. 32b-34b, Hamburg, 1752), gives it as his opinion that the original intention of Jesus, and especially of Paul, was to convert only the Gentiles to the seven moral laws of Noah and to let the Jews follow the Mosaic law—which explains the apparent contradictions in the New Testament regarding the laws of Moses and the Sabbath.”

 These men are saying 1.that if you are not a Jew, you are not permitted to observe any Sabbath or Holy Day. You cannot worship on Saturday, Sunday, Monday, or any other day of the week. 2.Jesus probably never meant for Gentiles to be converted, and Jews were still supposed to observe Jewish law. 3. If you do observe any day of rest, or establish any new commandment(i.e. Christian or Muslim commandments) you should be put to death.4. You are however allowed to observe the Seven Noahide Laws, since you are unworthy of any others.

 According to the beliefs of those who follow Kabbalism, you don't need to convert to Judaism. You only need to follow the Noahide Laws.

 Anyone who knows the Bible knows that the Ten Commandments are an improvement on the Noahide Laws. In the Old Testament Law, it requires multiple witnesses in order for someone to be executed. Noahide Law requires one. If you break Noahide Law, you are supposed to be decapitated."Whoever is to be found breaking one of these laws, is subject to capital punishment by decapitation" (Sanh.57a)."“The Encyclopedia Judaica,” 1192 “...violation of any of one of the seven laws subjects the Noahide to capital punishment by decapitation.”

 These people believe that only Jews are worthy of observing the Mosaic Law, that was meant to replace the Noahide law.

 Are you getting concerned?

 Did you know that Messianic Scripture is considered to be Anti-Semitic? The reason that is important, is because there are laws against Anti-Semitism. On October 8, 2004, the Global Anti-Semitism Review Act went into effect.

 That law does not protect Christians, Muslims, Bhuddists, etc. There are scripture that say that Christ was the one who had the choice to die, and that although the Jews wronged him, he was the one with the authority and power over his life. "No one takes it from Me, but I lay it down of Myself. I have authority to lay it down, and I have authority to receive it again. This command I have received from My Father.” (John 10:18). But if you were not careful how you worded that and you implied that the Jews were responsible for Christ's death, or put too much emphasis on the scripture that says they put a curse on themselves for it, you would be in violation of this law.

 Under the Noahide Laws, Christianity is Idolatry. If you speak His name, you have Blasphemed, and should be decapitated. Stephen was stoned to death in Acts for blasphemy.

 At face value, these laws are not really wrong, but when you consider things like that the Talmud and Sanhedrin has rules in place that require you to be killed for following these rules, they take on a more sinister aspect.

 The Rambam [12th-century rabbi Maimonides]wrote, there was no Sanhedrin, and he therefore outlines the steps necessary to establish one. "When there is a majority of rabbis in Israel who authorize one person to be an authority, he can then reestablish the Sanhedrin” (Israel National News, online edition, December 9, 2004).

 “On October 13, the Sanhedrin, the highest tribunal of the Jewish state and religion, was re-inaugurated by a group of rabbis in Tiberias after 1,600 years of absence. According to Jewish sources, last notice of the Sanhedrin dates around 425 A.D., also in the city of Tiberias. After that, it ceased to exist.” (Israel National News online edition, October 13, 2004).

 “Newly Formed Sanhedrin Ascend to Temple Mount”: “In a dramatic but unpublicized move Monday, members of the newly established Sanhedrin ascended the Temple Mount.….Rabbi Chaim Richmond, also a member of the Sanhedrin (Head of the Temple Institute in Jerusalem), hopes the body will bring about a revolution in Jewish jurisprudence…the revival of the Sanhedrin is also considered a crucial development in preparation for the messianic age and the rebuilding of the Temple.” (Arutz Sheva News, December 14, 2004)(http://www.google.com/urlsa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thesanhedrin.org%2Fen%2Findex.php%3Ftitle%3DHachrazah_5765_Kislev_26&ei=eTnNTsGpFXa0QHslMFC&usg=AFQjCNGDovon9kKZU9_ya01sHToIAdqOQA&sig2=V7frRefeUo7YUku57jnXQg)

 “Sanhedrin Recognizes Council to Teach Humanity--`Laws of Noah’ ”: “A group of non-Jewish delegates have come to Jerusalem to pledge their loyalty to the Laws of Noah. They appear before the nascent Sanhedrin, which established a High Council for B’nai Noach.” (Artuz Sheva News June 9, 2006)

 Under the Genocide Treaty, if you cause bodily or mental harm to another group, your trial can be held anywhere in the world. What constitutes harm? Disagreeing with them?

 The UN established an international court system in 1993. "Were talking about creating here something that exercises genuine power, real put-people-in-jail power, but that is responsible to no one but itself." said Lee Casey, a constitutional lawyer with the Washington firm of Hunton & Williams. [Investment Business Daily, Thursday July 16, 1998 Los Angeles, California]”

 By creating the Internation Criminal Tribunal, they violated one of the UN Charter,which states that the Council has no competence whatsoever in judicial matters.

 The UN released on 16 June 2000 a press release:

 "The Rules of Procedure and Evidence cover such issues as composition and administration of the Court, penalties for crimes, obligations of international cooperation and assistance, as well as enforcement of sentences. On the matter of crimes initially within the Court’s jurisdiction -- genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity -- the Commission is working to identify what elements would constitute those crimes and would need to be proven in order to obtain convictions. In the category of crimes against humanity, it is discussing such crimes as murder, enslavement, extermination, persecution, disappearance and sexual crimes."(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Criminal_Court)

 It's not that the crimes they are considering are a problem, it's the fact that they haven't identified what constitues those crimes, and that other peoples have jurisdiction over American Courts.

 The Masonic Creed is the true basis for these laws and courts. But if we concentrate on believing that it is just Jews, we might miss the slight of hand. There was a nationwide Christian Radio address to the Council for National Policy, by James Dobson, President of Focus on the Family. He said he was determined to do whatever was necessary "to restore the observance of "moral law." "God created Wisdom before He created anything else, the Moral Law is the law of the Universe."(http://www.google.com/urlsa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=10&ved=0CGMQFjAJ&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rigorousintuition.ca%2Fboard2%2Fviewtopic.php%3Ff%3D12%26t%3D1239&ei=0DrNTvyFH4bt0gH7v7wh&usg=AFQjCNGkHD18R0o2_ZD2vY5N7KHNEEdn6Q&sig2=j_Jwix4UtC8cEBJsWlHd7g)

 "Moral law" and "moral law of the Universe" are Masonic terms. There is no specific religion mentioned, no reference to sin or even God.

 "'Christianity is totally opposite to Judaism and any mixture of the two must result in the loss of all that is vital in the present plan of Salvation. One made its appeal to the limited resources of the natural man and conditioned his life on the earth; the other sets aside the natural man, secures a whole new creation in Christ Jesus, and counsels that new being in his pilgrim journey to his heavenly home.' (Chafer, Lewis Sperry, Dr. The Kingdom in History and Prophecy, p. 64)

 The Georgia House of Representatives Bill #1274, provides for the use of guillotines.

 To amend Article 2 of Chapter 10 of Title 17 of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, relating to the death penalty generally, so as to provide a statement of legislative policy; to provide for death by guillotine; to provide for applicability; to repeal conflicting laws; and for other purposes.

 SECTION 1. The General Assembly finds that while prisoners condemned to death may wish to donate one or more of their organs for transplant, any such desire is thwarted by the fact that electrocution makes all such organs unsuitable for transplant. The intent of the General Assembly in enacting this legislation is to provide for a method of execution which is compatible with the donation of organs by a condemned prisoner.

 The following is from www.noahide.org The Institute of Noahide Code is an educational and research which encourage the practice of The Seven Laws of Noah.

 The Noahide laws are comprised of seven universal laws biblically binding upon all humanity. They include prohibitions against idolatry, blasphemy, forbidden sexual relationships including adultery and incest, murder, theft, cruelty to animals and the failure to implement orderly processes of justice. In 1991, a joint resolution of the United States congress called its principles "the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization…” without which "the edifice of civilization stands in serious peril of returning to chaos".

 The Institute draws together Rabbis, lay leaders, scholars and educators to focus on current religious thinking within Judaism and Noahide laws and provides forums for dialogue to advance greater knowledge, understanding and harmony in Judaism and the Noahide practice.

 The growing participation of dialogue is also welcomed by the Institute. As members evaluate attitudes toward the universal laws of Noah, the Institute strives to foster the exploration of the major historical, philosophical and Halakah (Jewish law) issues on the frontier of Noahide practice/dialogue as these are formulated by Rabbis/scholars at the national and international levels.

 To achieve its goals, the Institute of Noahide Code develops programs and publications to help foster the practical adherence to the seven laws of Noah. The Institute also promotes independent research and serves as a vehicle for disseminating its findings to appropriate institutions and individuals around the world.

 The Institute advertises publishes conference proceedings, lectures, monographs, and a semi-annual publication, INC Perspective, and also maintains a web site, and is a UN NGO http://www.noahide.org/, filled with a variety of articles pertaining to the Noahide concerns. Please contact us....
 There is a link at the bottom of the page that says "One People One World." Presently you don't find anything when you click on it, but obviously, they have plans.

 Lubavitch Movement

 You might notice that this website is affiliated with the Lubavitch Movement. One of the modern schools of Judaic philosophy is Chabad-Lubavitch Hasidism, which Dr. Segal(Associate Professor of Theology) describes as Kabbalist movement on his website, at the Univeristy of Calgary.

 "The name 'Chabad' is a Hebrew acronym for the expression 'Chokmah,' 'Binah" and 'Da'at' -- Wisdom, Intelligence and Knowledge. These Kabbalistic terms are central to the distinctive intellectual theology of the movement... The name Lubavitch refers to a town in Lithuania that was the centre of the movement for a brief period during the nineteenth century... Chabad Hasidism continued to be a major force among Russian and Lithuanian Jews from its inception...(http://www.google.com/urlsa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=10&ved=0CGMQFjAJ&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.angelfire.com%2Fjournal2%2Fwatch-unto-prayer%2FHRconnections.html&ei=xDvNTu2AGebh0QGC6rkN&usg=AFQjCNFmaDNcq7mSi8XtSeGwtVPZS_XgQ&sig2=b9kS7-jPsVpr5ONItQLsEg)

 "In 1940 the head of the movement Rabbi Joseph Isaac Schneerson moved to America from Russia. From the outset he expressed his determination to make the Lubavitch movement into an American religious movement (e.g., by abandoning the traditional European long frocks in favour of American-style dress)."

 Chabad-Lubovitch has an international headquarters in New York. They lobby on Capital Hill for their causes.

 It was through their machinations that the Noahide Laws were slipped past us. In 1991, Chabad-Lubavitch in cooperation with President Bush established the observance of Education Day, USA "to return the world to the moral and ethical values contained in the Seven Noahide Laws."

 Public Law 102--14 (H.J. Res. 104): March 20, 1991
 Education Day, USA Proclamation
 Joint Resolution to designate March 26, 1991 as "Education Day, USA"
 Whereas Congress recognizes the historical tradition of ethical values and principles which are the basis of civilized society and upon which our great Nation was founded;

 Whereas these ethical values and principles have been the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization, when they were known as the Seven Noahide Laws;

 Whereas without these ethical values and principles the edifice of civilization stands in serious peril of returning to chaos;

 Whereas society is profoundly concerned with the recent weakening of these principles that has resulted in crises that beleaguer and threaten the fabric of civilized society;

 Whereas the justified preoccupation with these crises must not let the citizens of this Nation lose sight of their responsibility to transmit these ethical values from our distinguished past to the generations of the future;

 Whereas the Lubavitch movement has fostered and promoted these ethical values and principles throughout the world;

 Whereas Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, leader of the Lubavitch movement, is universally respected and revered and his eighty-ninth birthday falls on March 26, 1991;

 Whereas in tribute to this great spiritual leader, "the rebbe", this, his ninetieth year will be seen as one of "education and giving", the year in which we turn to education and charity to return the world to the moral and ethical values contained in the Seven Noahide Laws;

and Whereas this will be reflected in an international scroll of honor signed by the President of the United States and other heads of state: Now, therefore be it

 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That March 26, 1991, the start of the ninetieth year of Rabbi Menachem Schneerson, leader of the worldwide Lubavitch movement, is designated as "Education Day. U.S.A.". The President is requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United States to observe such day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

 Approved March 20, 1991.

 If you were aware of anything at all going on, it was probably just National Education Day.You might have thought it had something to do with schools.

 The Noachide Laws - The Encyclopedia of Judaism
 (1) Civil justice [the duty to establish a legal system];
 (2) Prohibition of blasphemy [which includes the bearing of false witness];
 (3) The abandonment of idolatry;
 (4) The prohibition of incest [including adultery and other sexual offenses];
 (5) The prohibition of murder;
 (6) Also that of theft;
 (7) The law against eating flesh [a limb] cut from a living animal [ie., cruelty in any shape or form] (T.B. Sanh. 56A)

 Don't forget that even Christ was considered to be guilty of blasphemy. Obviously the Sanhedren doesn't consider execution to be murder.
 Remember that I previously pointed out that much of the authority for establishing a new Sanhedrin comes from Maimonides. Here is a quote from him:

 "It is a mitzvah [religious duty; ARC], however, to eradicate Jewish traitors, minnim, and apikorsim, and to cause them to descend to the pit of destruction, since they cause difficulty to the Jews and sway the people away from God, as did Jesus of Nazareth and his students, and Tzadok, Baithos, and their students. May the name of the wicked rot."

 He wrote that in the Mishnah which was the forerunner of the Torah, which is made of of the Mishnah and Rabbinical commentaries called the Gemara. Jesus condemned the Mishnah for allowing the traditions of men to make God's word null. (Mark 7:1-13)

 Know your Bible because they intend to use it against you. The Chabad Lubavitch, B'nai Noach and even some Messianic organizations say that the Noahide Laws are those given to Noah in Genesis 9 and/or the Jerusalem Council in Acts 15. Neither place in the scripture contains these 7 commandments as a code of universal law.

 Noahide is their term for us. "A bat Noach [daughter of Noah] or b'nai Noach [son/child of Noah] is a non-Jew (Noahide) who follows the Jewish laws specifically given by God for them." It is similar to Gentile.

 They intend for uneducated people to believe that the Noahide laws are part of the Ten Laws given to Moses."...the Seven Universal Laws were given on Mount Sinai at the time when the Torah was given to the Jewish people...With the Giving of the Torah, the G-d of Israel chose the descendants of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob as His Chosen People, commanding them to fulfill the 613 precepts of the Torah. He also commanded the righteous of the other nations of the world to keep the Seven Commandments of the Children of Noah and commanded Moses and his people teach them how."

 Everyone should be very concerned.

Tuesday, November 22, 2011

Wall Street, Big Business and Money, And the Money Making Machine of Big Pharma and Cancer Treatment

I recently saw a chart posted on my facebook wall
showing where much of the money in the world is spent.

I feel great frustration with people's obsession with money and Wall Street.
Wall Street is the right entity to be angry with, but money is the wrong thing
to be angry about. It pales in comparison to some of their greater sins.

One of the things on those charts says that cancer treatment costs as
much as we spend on cigarettes. In case you wonder why, it's because the Rockefellers
invented cancer research, development and treatment, as well as starting the
cancer society. In the process they did some pretty monstrous things to patients;
Frankenstein type things. In the 1940's the Journal of American Medicine's
largest advertising client was Philip Morris. Camel cigarettes had the largest
booth at the AMA's convention in 1948. Many of their so called treatments are
actually carcinogenic and cause cancer. For instance Tamoxifen has been
proven to only delay onset of cancer and to actually increase uterine
cancer in those under 50. The head of the National Cancer Institute had to
resign after it came out. Yet the dirty FDA still allows it to be sold.

We pay taxes that fund cancer drug research. Then the drugs are handed over
to drug companies who make money hand over fist without paying back any of the taxes.

One of the first dirty things the Rockefellers did in respect to cancer was sell
a drug made out of petroleum as a cure. The Rockefellers had a big part in the development of established medicine in this country. They promoted the use of petro-pharmaceuticals, drugs made from by-products of the petroleum industry.

Imperial Chemicals is one of the companies that make things that cause breast cancer. They have
a subsidiary company called Zeneca Pharmaceuticals that makes chemicals used in cancer treatment.
They also make Tamoxifen. One of the fastest way to have your product be successful is to create
a market for it. Tamoxifen treats a cancer they caused. The treatment causes cancer and then
they get to treat your cancer again. Of course it is for a price.

"This is no accident," Dr. Epstein writes. "Zeneca Pharmaceuticals--a spin-off of Imperial Chemical Industries is one of the world's largest manufacturers of chlorinated and other industrial chemicals, including those incriminated as causes of breast cancer.

Zeneca has also been the sole multimillion-dollar funder of the National Breast Cancer Awareness Month since its inception in 1984, besides the sole manufacturer of Tamoxifen, the world's top-selling anticancer and breast cancer "prevention" drug, with $400 million in annual sales.

Furthermore, Zeneca recently assumed direct management of 11 cancer centers in U.S. hospitals. Zeneca owns a 50 percent stake in these centers known collectively as Salick Health Care."

Epstein's book info can be found here:http://www.preventcancer.com/documents/ACS.pdf


Of course, since their funding comes from chemical companies through the drug companies they own, the ACS and
National Cancer Institute are not going to focus much on what prevents cancer. That might offend their sponsers.

"Giant corporations, which profited handsomely while they polluted air, water, the workplace, and food with a wide range of carcinogens, remain greatly comforted by the silence of the ACS. This silence reflected a complex of mindsets fixated on diagnosis, treatment, and basic genetic research, together with ignorance, indifference, and even hostility to prevention."

"Not surprisingly, the incidence of cancer over past decades has escalated, approximately parallel to its increased funding," Dr. Epstein writes.

"Every discoverer of a cancer remedy has encountered a Chinese wall of resistance," which has been the same in every page of recorded cancer history, and that the myth that the discoverer of a cancer cure would be "honored, acclaimed, and practically deified as a saviour of the human race," should be changed to "dishonored, denounced and crucified, unless he is a fair haired boy of the dominating oligarchy." THE CANCER BLACKOUT An Illuminating, Factual Survey by M. H. Clutter, D.R.L

Don't get me started on the fact that when you donate to them, just like many other charities, the money mostly
pays for executives running the show. All the while the cancer rate is tripling, not dropping. That's because we
continue to be exposed to chemicals, in our environment, in processed foods, and personal care products. They sell
us food that causes cancer, heart disease, and diabetes, again making a market for their drugs.

"A solution to cancer would mean the termination of research programs, the obsolescence of skills, the end of dreams of personal glory, triumph over cancer would dry up contributuions to self-perpetrating charities...It would mortally threaten the present clinical establishments by rendering obsolete the expensive surgical, radiological and chemotherapeutic treatments in which so much money, training and equipment is invested...The new therapy must be disbelieved, denied, discouraged and disallowed at all costs, regardless of actual testing results, and preferably without any testing at all."---Robert Houston and Gary Null

Mammography is another of their dirty little secrets. The ACS promotes mammography heavily, because they are heavily funded by the industries that profit from it such as, Siemens, DuPont, General Electric, Eastman Kodak and Piker.Several of their presidents have been radiologists. These companies have members on the ACS's advisory boards. And of course they donate and quite a bit of the research conducted by the them is used by the ACS without
regard to the fact that it's results would be biased.

The American Cancer Society was formed by an advertising executive and a drug
company CEO. They actually have a special committee to seek and destroy any
treatment not endorsed by them.

The AMA licenses doctors, which means they can pull the license of a doctor
who does not use one of their endorsed treatments. They tend to defer to
the American Cancer Society(ACS)on what they endorse. The ACS and FDA
work hand in glove with the pharmaceutical companies. The AMA gets its funding
from the Big Pharma. Healing Cancer Naturally

In the 1850's the AMA launched a political campaign against abortion. Prior to this time abortion had been legal and it didn't even catch much flack from the Catholic Church so long as it was done in the early stages of pregnancy, before movement could be felt. Their campaign hit full speed in the 1860's, when they began calling abortionists murderers and executioners. Between 1875 and 1900, every state except Kentucky banned abortion. Women began dying in the hundreds of thousands from complications of back alley abortion. The AMA also was against birth control of any other form. They were not really very pious and their motivations were not very altruistic. Their internal memorandums showed that they were not concerned with the sanctity of life. Their true cause was running women healers out of the business. Midwives were frequently who women went to see for contraception and abortion.

At the same time the AMA began it's persecution of homeopaths. There were books published that ran down the idea of any form of alternative medicine, and the AMA forbade it's members to associate with homeopaths. Then they began having homeopaths expelled from medical societies.

It took the AMA quite some time to get rid of homeopathic medicine. People were very responsive to the idea of any treatment that didn't require them to take large doses of medicine that made them ill, required being bled, or surgery. But some people preferred the quick fix of popping a pill to the time consuming homeopathic treatment.It is harder to take care of yourself in order to prevent or fix damage than it is to take a pill later.

In 1910 a man named Abraham Flexner wrote the "Flexner Report" funded by the Carnegie Foundation. The Carnegie Foundation is closely tied to the Rockefeller Foundation. After this report, medical schools who were approved of by Flexner, received funding from the Carnegies and Rockefellers, not so if Flexner did not approve of a school. He had first worked for the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. While Flexner was with the Carnegie Foundation, he had done a study on the possible modernization of medical schools. Within the Rockefeller machine, The General Education Board, he would find the money to put his ideas to work.The AMA saw the writing on the wall and allied itself with the money.

For more on Flexner see The Socialist Takeover Of The Public School System And The Plan To Teach Us To Conform

State boards through Rockefeller influence denied licenses to doctors that were not from AMA approved schools. Between 1900 and 1917, the number of homeopathic colleges dropped from 22 to 7. The AMA also closed medical schools for women and blacks. While there were some benefits to this standardization of medicine like making sure that doctors were properly educated in good science, the reason for it was consolidation of power and money. John D. Rockefeller chose not to take the drugs his foundations promoted. His doctor was a homeopath. He lived until he was almost 100 years old.

"...a surgeon told John D. (Rockefeller) that everyone should have an appendectomy before the age of 16 as a preventative. The oil wizard saw the point at once. 'Why, you've got a better thing than Standard Oil!', he exclaimed." - In Nat Morris, The Cancer Blackout.

They learned how to control what was taught in the medical schools and began to apply the pricipals to the public education system as well. The Socialist Takeover Of The Public School System And The Plan To Teach Us To Conform

They established an organization called the General Education Board, part of the Rockefeller Foundation, and John D. Rockefeller, Sr. donated $1 Million dollars to it, initially, and it then became absorbed into the Slater and Peabody Funds.

Frederick Taylor Gates: "The object of this Association is to provide a vehicle through which capitalists of the North who sincerely desire to assist in the great work of Southern education may act with assurance that their money will be wisely used."

Frederick Taylor Gates: "In our dreams, we have limitless resources and the people yield themselves with perfect docility to our molding bands. The present education conventions fade from their minds, and unhampered by tradition, we work our own good will upon a grateful and responsive rural folk. We shall not try to make these people or any of their children into philosophers or men of learning, or men of science. We have not to raise up from among them authors, editors, poets or men of letters. We shall not search for embryo great artists, painters, musicians nor lawyers, doctors, preachers, politicians, statesmen, of whom we have an ample supply.
The task we set before ourselves is very simple as well as a very beautiful one, to train these people as we find them to a perfectly ideal life just where they are. So we will organize our children and teach them to do in a perfect way the things their fathers and mothers are doing in an imperfect way, in the homes, in the shops and on the farm." From one of the Board's Newsletters.

Modern medicine, including, psychology, psychiatry, cancer tretments, drugs and also educational methods, are a result of the fact that his money was almost limitless, and J.D. Rockefeller, Sr. had a desire to enhance his public relations, through philanthropy. The science and morals behind these systems is very dubious. The Socialist Takeover Of The Public School System And The Plan To Teach Us To Conform


The Rockefellers and the AMA are all about public relations. Rockefeller began his foundations because he had a bad image as a murderer and a robber baron after some of his miners were machine gunned to death for not marching to his tune. His advisors suggested that he start foundations to give away some of his money, to avoid paying taxes and get some good P.R. in the process. The AMA came under fire for the fact that the JAMA was being primarily funded by drug adds, which violated the AMA's code of ethics. In 1899 George Simmons was hired as the new editor of the JAMA and he formed an alliance with the drug industry, which made the JAMA highly profitable.

At this time the AMA began accepting money in order to give a drug it's "seal of approval." Abbott Laboratories found another method for getting approval. Wallace Abbott investigated Simmons and found out that he had dubious medical credentials and had been charged with sexual abuse of his patients.He got his approval for free.(Mullins, Murder by Injection, pp. 19-21.)

Simmons was a very immoral and corrupt man. The movie Gaslight was inspired by his life. He had a mistress and wanted rid of his wife. So, he drugged her and tried to convince her that she was crazy. She got wise to him thought and sued him. The result was a sensational trial. He had to resign from the AMA and was replaced by Lawrence Fishbein, his protege.

Fishbein extended the AMA's influence into the food industry. They tested food to determine if it would get the "seal of approval." Usually it was really determined by money. While the AMA was stating that two tuna companies met its stringent standards, the FDA was seizing the shipments of both companies because "they consisted in whole or in part of decomposed animal substand." (Mullins, Murder by Injection, p. 26.) One of the companies that advertised it's AMA approval was Land O' Lakes butter, which had previously been prosecuted for adulterating its product to keep the fact that it was spoiled from being detected. In the 1940's the AMA stopped giving approval for food, largely because it was narrowly escaping lawsuits. They quickly replaced this with the field of surgery.

Surgery was a barbaric business until the 1880's when antiseptics and anesthesia made it more respectible. A man named William Halsted went to Germany to study medicine. He was a great proponent of German medicine. He pioneered sterile surgery. He also perfected invasive surgery. He is considered the inventor of radical mastectomy.

Due to his methods, surgery became the prefered method of treating cancer. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York was founded by J.Marion Sims. Prior to that he was performing surgery on slave women in the 1840's. They made excellent guinea pigs because they were at the bottom of society. He did his surgery without any anesthesia. He had his friends hold the women down. It was written that his operations were "little short of murderous" and that his friends could only generally only stand to participate in this experimentation one time. Eventually the plantation owners in the area stopped allowing him to experiment on their slave women. Undaunted by this setback, he bought a female slave for $500 and performed 30 operations on her in a short period of time. He was eventually run out of town for his monstrous practices.

He went to New York and founded th Women's Hospital in 1855, as a charity hospital. This gave him a new supply of unfortunate immigrant women to experiment on. He was expelled from the hospital in the 1870's for his treatment of women. He then began to seek out wealthy women for patients. His patients were mostly suffering from vesico-vaginal fistulas. His work with these women got him reinstated at the hospital.

One of the Astor heirs died from Cancer and in their grief, the family gave the Women's Hospital $150,000 to open a cancer treatment center. Having witnessed Sim's methods the trustees were not too keen on the idea. So, Sims had the Astors set him up in a new hospital. Had he lived, he would have been the first director of the New York Cancer Center, which opened in 1884. The hospital changed it's name to Memorial Hospital in the 1890's, and to Sloan-Kettering in the 1950's.(Ralph Moss’ The Cancer Industry, pp. 46-47.) (Mullins, Murder by Injection, pp. 60-62.)

In it's early days the surgeries used to treat cancer were monstrous. One surgery was called the "commando". It removed the whole jaw of the patient and reminded the doctors of the slashig attacks of WWI commandos. The doctors at Memorial Hosptial did proceedures that basically hollowed out the entire body in an attempt to remove all cancer. They also amputated bodies from the waist down to treat pelvic cancer. Many patients chose death.(Moss, The Cancer Industry, pp. 48-49.)

The hospital received another benefactor in James Douglas. He owned the largest copper mine in the world. He also owned radium and uranium deposits. He wanted experiments conducted using radium to treat cancer. He gave the hospital $100,000 for this. The price of radium immediately went up by 1000%. Douglas died in 1913 of radiation poisoning. By the 1920's Memorial Hospital derived most of it's income from radium treatment.

In 1927, the Rockefellers contributed millions to Memorial Hospital, as well as land to build a new hospital on in the 1930's. At the same time, Standard Oil of New Jersey, owned by the Rockefellers began doing business with I.G.Farben. They were the company that developed the Sarin, Tabun and Zyklon B used in the Nazi gas chambers.

Through the Rockefeller's connection to I.G. Farben, Memorial Hospital began chemotherapy prior to WWII. Standard Oil had one of it's executives, Frank Howard on the hospital's research committee. He talked G.M. executives Alfred P. Sloan and Charls Kettering into donating for the purpose of turning Memorial Hospital into a research and treatment center.

Kettering Laboratoris in Cincinnati was responsible for the research that showed that lead, fluoride and aluminum were benign substances. Sloan was connected to the Morgan family, as in J.P. Morgan. The Morgans were also part of the control behind the hospital.

What makes this research done by Kettering relevant is that it paved the way for chemotherapy.Chemicals like arsenic and lead have been used since the time of Paracelsus, but the patient usually died. In the 1930's it was considered barbaric as a treatment and the proponents or radiation were against it for their own reasons. During WWII chemicals like DDT, and nerve gas were used. Napalm was invented and atomic weapons. Chemicals began to be looked upon as a way to better our lives.

Where is this going? Wallstreet runs Memorial Sloan-Kettering, and the hospital controls cancer research in the West. These corporations are not philanthropic. They are out to get a profit. But the ultimate damage they create is not in the fact that they have more money than everyone else, it is in the fact that they destroy lives, and damage the quality of our lives, by messing with our health.

The ultimate goal behind taking over medicine and education is socialism. If you do not believe that socialism is the intent of these founders of the education system, take it from John Dewey's own words.

"All that society has accomplished for itself is put, through the agency of the school, at the disposal of its future members. All its better thoughts of itself it hopes to realize through the new possibilities thus opened to its future self. Here individualism and socialism are at one."

The important thing to know is that it's not going to do anyone a bit of good
to complain about the money, because they knew that they were going to mess it
up back before WWII and they knew that if they didn't occupy our minds in other ways
we would get mad about it; so they set about secretly taking away our civil rights
so that when we did get mad, they would be able to turn those laws that people are
unaware of loose on us to shut people up. If they came out with semi truck loads
of their money and threw it to us, it wouldn't do us a bit of good with no civil rights.

And they were able to take our civil rights away because they took away our ability to
think for ourselves through the public education system. The Socialist Takeover Of The Public School System And The Plan To Teach Us To Conform

One of the worst things they have worked diligently to take from us is our faith in God.


Here is a Timeline of how the Rockefellers changed modern medicine.




1901 – Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research Opens
Based out of New York, this became one of the most “richly endowed” research centers. By 1928, John D. Rockefeller had given it $65 million in endowment funds. This later became Rockefeller University.(Paul Starr, “The Social Transformation of American Medicine.”)



1910 – Flexner Report Published, Establishes New Standards For Medical Education

This highly influential report, sponsored by the Rockefeller’s and Carnegie Foundation, evaluated medical schools and restructured American medical education. It set up a new standard so that schools could only be accredited if they showed an emphasis in drug based research and treatment. Homeopathy and other alternative approaches to medicine were no longer recognized. Abraham Flexner, author of the report, was on the staff of the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. In 1910, 161 medical schools existed. By 1919, there were only 81 left.(http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Health_Concerns/Pharmageddon/drugs_and_big_money.htm)(http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=American_Medical_Association)


1913 – Rockefeller Foundation Establishes the International Health Commission
This laid the foundation for how health and science research and development were to be conducted. Many of today’s health institutions were modeled on this commission’s practices, policies, and research processes such as the UN’s World Health Organization, the U.S. Government’s National Science Foundation, and the National Institute of Health.



1918 – Public Health Becomes Rockefeller Foundation’s Top Priority

“The Foundation identifies public health education as one of its principal areas of interest, and builds and endows the first school of public health at Johns Hopkins University.”



1921 – Rockefeller Foundation Contributes $357 million to Medical Schools Around the World (According to the Rockefeller Foundation, this was $357 million in “current dollars” (http://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/who-we-are/our-history/1920-1929/)

This spreads the drug-based approach to the most prominent schools around the world.



1922 – Dr. Royal Raymond Rife Begins Cancer Research

In the 1920s, Dr. Rife – a brilliant bacteriologist and former student of John Hopkins University – began researching and developing an alternative cancer cure.



1924 – Morris Fishbein Becomes Primary Editor of JAMA

JAMA, the Journal of the American Medical Association, is one of the most influential medical journals in the world. As head of JAMA, Morris Fishbein, became one of most powerful, prominent men in medicine during the time. He transformed the industry into a money-making machine and used negative campaigns to squash competitors. He was one of the key figures to suppress Dr. Royal Rife’s cancer cure.



1924 – Harry Hoxsey Founds First Cancer Clinic in Taylorville, Illinois

Harry Hoxsey offers a natural herbal formula to cure cancer that thousands claim to have worked. This is the first of 17 clinics to eventually open.



1926 – JAMA Publishes First Tirade Against Hoxsey

The article scares doctors and researchers from being associated with Hoxsey.



1927 – John D. Rockefeller Jr. Gave the First of his Annual $60,000 Contribution to Memorial (Sloan-Kettering) Cancer Center



1932 – Dr. Rife Develops Cancer Cure

Dr. Rife developed a machine that could neutralize disease-causing micro-organisms, including cancer cells, with the use of radio frequencies.



1932 - Director of Rockefeller Institute, Dr. Thomas Rivers, Denies Success of Rife Cancer Treatment

In 1932, Dr. Arthur Kendall, director of Medical Research at Northwestern University, spoke before the Association of American Physicians at Johns Hopkins University about the preliminary successes with Rife's methods and treatments of cancer. Dr. Thomas Rivers, virologist and bacteriologist, director of the Rockefeller Institute (a primary source of funding for medical research) and Dr. Hans Zinsser, called Kendall a liar to his face in front of the assembled crowd.(http://educate-yourself.org/cn/rifetimelinemay1998.shtml)

1934 - Rife’s Treatment Cures 16 Terminally Ill Cancer Patients

In 1934 at the Scripps Institute in La Jolla, Southern California, Rife conducted clinical trials on 16 terminally ill cancer patients, and successfully cured all of them. A team of medical specialists – including Dr. Milbank Johnson, Chairman of the Special Medical Research Committee of USC; George Fischer of the NY Children’s Hospital; and Dr. Wayland Morrison, the chief medical officer of the Santa Fe Railway – confirmed the findings.



1938 – The AMA Indicts Rife for Fraudulent Medical Practices



1939 – Philip Hoyland Files Suit Against Royal Rife’s Company, the Beam Ray Corporation

Philip Hoyland admitted to accepting a $10,000 bribe from Hahn Realty Group (AMA Agents) to sue the Beam Ray Corporation.



1939 – New Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Opens – John D. Rockefeller donated the land and provided $3 million of funding



1940s – Rife’s Work Is Destroyed & Continues to be Suppressed



1949 – Hoxsey Sues JAMA and Editors for Libel and Slander – Hoxsey Wins



1949 – Morris Fishbein is Ousted from AMA



1956 – FDA Issues Public Warning About Hoxsey Cancer Treatment



1960 – Hoxsey Method Banned in U.S. by the FDA



1960 – Laurance Rockefeller Serves as Chairman of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York from 1960-1982

This center is one of the most influential cancer centers in the world. During WWII it performed some of the first experiments applying chemical warfare weapons to the “treatment of cancer”, which evolved into chemotherapy.



1963 – Bio-Medical (Hoxsey) Center Opens in Tijuana, Mexico

It continues to operate and claims an 80% success rate.



1971 – President Nixon Declares a “War on Cancer”

Signs $1.6 billion law.



1977 – Sloan-Kettering Rejects Laetrile (derived from Apricot Kernels) as Effective Cancer Treatment

This is despite positive results from Sloan-Kettering’s own famous researcher, Kanematsu Suguira. In November of 1977 Dr. Ralph Moss, Assistant Director of public affairs at Sloan-Kettering, held a press-conference about the success and potential of laetrile, despite the centers desire to cover it up. Ralph Moss was fired the next day for “failing to carry out the most basic job responsibilities.”



1991 – Rockefeller Foundation Helps Start Children’s Vaccine Initiative

The Foundation joins with the United Nations Development Programme, UNICEF, WHO and the World Bank to form the Children’s Vaccine Initiative (CVI). These organizations cause human beings untold harm through enforced immunizations.



2010 – More Than Half a Million Americans Die of Cancer

Monday, November 7, 2011

Occupy Wall Street Idiots

When the Occupy Wallstreet Movement started, I had misgivings about it.
The problems seemed obvious to me. For starters, when was the last time
you complained about somebody having too much money and had them go "Here
you go, you can have some of my money, there is more where that came from?"
That doesn't even touch on the hypocracy of saying that some people are
wrong for considering money important, while simultaneously saying, "Give me
some." And getting mad at minimum wage fast food employees for not feeding you for free, is sorta begrudging them their minimum wage, isn't it?

The second more insidious problem I saw was that those who know history and politics have been predicting for some time now that those in power(don't mean the politicians, but the ones who put them in office) would use riots and anarchy as an excuse to do things like institute marshal law. So, I felt that protesting and marches was just giving them an excuse and for something dumb. I'm not communist and you are never going to convince me that taking money away from someone who took it from me fair and square is going to happen or be successful. They are going to get pissed and fight back. If you are going to poke the bear, you better do it for a good reason and do it in a way that at least has a good chance at success, because the bear doesn't care if you are
happy. Complaining in front of cameras won't help.

Supposing that I am correct in my belief that there are those who would like to do away with our Democracy and establish marshal law. What would be the best way to do that. Either instigate some violence or wait till some breaks out on it's own. Those who control all the rest of our country, control our press, so they put what spin on it that they feel is useful.

Now guess what has happened? Either they instigated this whole thing to start with, or they allowed a bunch of communist nut jobs to infiltrate the movement and start doing things that look pretty bad, like taking their kids to the protest, throwing them in front of the canons and then saying, "Look the police hurt my kids." Jeepers, maybe a babysitter would have been appropriate and been more helpful to your cause. John Lennon and Yoko didn't take their kids to their protests.

If the people on the news openly stating that they are communist and getting their kids stomped are not part of the original movement, and are part of a lunatic fringe,then the Occupy Wallstreet people had an obligation to keep them out and away from their protest. Because ultimately what better thing to protest against than communism and bad parenting? That is a human issue not a monetary one. The stupid people are complaining that some other people have too much money, and are therefore putting the same importance on money (basic greed) that the Wall Street bankers put on it in order to do the damage that they have done. The big difference is that the protesters are forgetting that when they point one finger at Wallstreet, four fingers are pointing back at themselves.

For goodness sake, this past weekend they protested Tea Party Members. Do they not know that the
Tea Party was to protest taxes and held by anti government radicals? Somebody must have forgotten
to explain that you can be Republican and still think the government needs some reform. Basically,
reformers went to protest some reformers this weekend. That is if you truly believe that some of the Wall Street protesters aren't nut job anarchists and that it was just some of them that were.

If you keep up the anarchy crap, just wait and see what happens. You guys make as much sense as someone saying "The world is going to end in 2012 so just set off the nuclear bombs anyway, you might as well."

Go home and stock up on some canned food, water (and if you can get over your hypocritical self, stock up on some gold) and do something useful for your families. The bear doesn't care if you are hungry and need a bath. But he will sure take advantage of it in order to eat your skanky butt.



Saturday, July 2, 2011

SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE?


Founding Father, John Jay, said that "Every member of the state ought diligently to read and study the constitution. By knowing their rights, they will sooner perceive when they are violated and be the better prepared to defend and assert them."



SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE

THIS PHRASE COMES FROM A LETTER WRITTEN BY THOMAS JEFFERSON. HE WAS IN EUROPE WHEN THE CONSTITUTION WAS WRITTEN AND HE DIDN'T EVEN SEE IT UNTIL IT WAS WRITTEN. HE DIDN'T HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH IT. "I was in Europe when the Constitution was planned, and never saw it till after it was established. On receiving it, I wrote strongly to Mr. Madison, urging the want of provision for... an express reservation to the States of all rights not specifically granted to the Union." --Thomas Jefferson to Joseph Priestley, 1802. ME 10:325

WHEN HE WROTE THE LETTER, HE WAS REASSURING THE MEMBERS OF THE DANBURY BAPTIST ASSOCIATION, WHO WROTE TO HIM, BECAUSE THEY WERE AFRAID THAT AT SOME TIME IN THE FUTURE THE GOVERNMENT WOULD COME BACK ON THEM AND SAY THAT THE GOVERNMENT GAVE THEM FREEDOM OF RELIGION AND NOT THAT GOD HAD GIVEN IT TO THEM. HE TOLD THEM THAT A WALL HAD BEEN BUILT TO KEEP CHURCH AND STATE SEPARATED. http://www.loc.gov/loc/lcib/9806/danpre.html

THERE ARE RECORDS OF THE MONTHS OF DEBATES THAT OCCURRED WHERE THE LEGISLATORS DEBATED WHAT SHOULD GO INTO THE FIRST AMENDMENT. THERE IS NOTHING IN THOSE RECORDS TO INDICATE THAT THEIR "INTENT" WAS THAT WE SHOULD NOT BE ABLE TO PRAY IN PUBLIC OR THAT ALL RELIGIOUS INFLUENCES SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM GOVERNMENT, BUT INSTEAD THAT GOVERNMENT SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM CHURCH. HE WAS REFERRING TO THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE, AND NOT THE FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE.

WHEN HE WAS VICE PRESIDENT, HE STARTED CHURCH SERVICES AT THE CAPITAL. BY THE LATE 1800'S, 2000 PEOPLE WERE MEETING FOR CHURCH SERVICE ON FEDERAL PROPERTY. HE ALSO STARTED CHURCH SERVICES AT THE WAR DEPARTMENT AND THE TREASURY. TWO DAYS AFTER HE WROTE THE LETTER TO THE DANBURY BAPTIST ASSOCIATION HE ATTENDED CHURCH SERVICE AT THE CAPITAL. THE LETTER WAS WRITTEN JANUARY 1, 1802. HE WENT TO CHURCH JANUARY 3, 1802. http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/religion/rel06-2.html HE EVEN HAD THE USMC BAND PLAY AT THESE CHURCH SERVICES.

HE WAS ASKED WHY HE ATTENDED CHURCH AT THE CAPITAL ALL THROUGH HIS EIGHT YEARS AS PRESIDENT. HE ANSWERED, "NO NATION HAS EVER EXISTED OR BEEN GOVERNED WITHOUT RELIGION, NOR CAN BE. THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION IS THE BEST RELIGION THAT HAS BEEN GIVEN TO MAN, AND I AS CHIEF MAGISTRATE OF THIS NATION, AM BOUND TO GIVE IT THE SANCTION OF MY EXAMPLE."

HE SIGNED DOCUMENTS NOT ONLY 'IN THE YEAR OF OUR LORD', AS MANY OTHER FOUNDERS DID, BUT 'IN THE YEAR OF OUR LORD,CHRIST'.

TO ME THAT SEEMS RATHER CONTRADICTORY TO THE IDEA WE ARE SPOON FED THAT HE DIDN'T BELIEVE IN RELIGION.


THE WORD CONSENT IS USED THREE TIMES IN THE DECLARATION AND ELEVEN TIMES IN THE CONSTITUTION. THE FOUNDING FATHERS WANTED GOVERNMENT TO GOVERN WITH OUR CONSENT, NOT TO USE THEIR POWER AGAINST US. THEY ALSO MADE IT CLEAR THAT THE RIGHTS WE HAVE ARE GOD GIVEN AND NOT GOVERNMENT GIVEN. THOSE RIGHTS ARE UNIVERSAL TO ALL MEN, WHICH IS WHY THEY CALLED THEM LAWS OF NATURE, AND REFERRED TO THE GOD OF NATURE. THEY ALSO CALLED THEM SELF EVIDENT.


PRESIDENT JAMES GARFIELD, "NOW MORE THAN EVER BEFORE, THE PEOPLE ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CHARACTER OF THEIR CONGRESS. IF THAT BODY BE IGNORANT, RECKLESS AND CORRUPT, IT IS BECAUSE THE PEOPLE TOLERATE, IGNORANCE, RECKLESSNESS AND CORRUPTION. IF IT BE INTELLIGENT, BRAVE AND PURE, IT IS BECAUSE THE PEOPLE DEMAND THESE HIGH QUALITIES TO REPRESENT THEM IN THE NATIONAL LEGISLATURE."


Wednesday, June 29, 2011

Do You Have The Right To Life?

Most people think of that phrase in connection to the abortion issue, but I am not talking about that. I am talking about the right not to be killed by another human being or group of human beings.

If you believe that you have the right not to be killed, what do you have the right to do to prevent being killed?

In 1776The Declaration of Independence says that you have the right to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.

In 1948, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted by the United Nations General Assembly declared in article three:
“Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person."

In 1950, the European Convention on Human Rights was adopted by the Council of Europe, declaring a protected human right to life in Article 2. There are exceptions for lawful executions and self-defense, arresting a fleeing suspect, and suppressing riots and insurrections. Since then Protocol 6 of the Convention has called for nations to outlaw capital punishment except in time of war or national emergency, and at present this pertains in all countries of the Council. Protocol 13 provides for the total abolition of capital punishment, and has been implemented in most member countries of the Council.

In 1966, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights was adopted by the United Nations General Assembly.
“Every human being has the inherent right to life. This right shall be protected by law. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his life.”—Article 6.1 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights

In 1982, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms enshrined that
“Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.”
—Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

In 1989, the United Nations General Assembly adopted the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC).

The Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany holds the principle of human dignity paramount, even above the right to life.

The Catholic Church has issued a Charter of the Rights of the Family in which it states that the right to life is directly implied by human dignity.

There are many tangents that you can get off on from this subject, abortion, capital punishment, euthanasia, etc. But where these things tend to divide people, there are several things that people tend to agree are more or less universal truths. Once you are born, you are definitely alive, if you take a breath. If your brain is functioning, you are alive. People who believe in a creator, believe that whatever it takes to sustain that life, is not just a right but a responsibility, because your body is God's temple.

But there are some people who believe that it would be more appropriate to defend an animal, like a whale, than to defend a human life. If a cathedral were being desecrated, some people believe that it would be mandatory to protect it. But what about the human body/temple?

Legally, you have the right to self-defense. But it is sad that we have strayed so far from morality, to need laws to say so. Morality should be a higher standard than the legal system.

Why does morality matter? Because inherent in the right to live, is the value of your life. If something has a value, then there will always be something that has a higher value or a lesser value. If you live your life in an immoral manner, and given the chance to redeem yourself, rehabilitate yourself, or whatever term you find appropriate, then I don't feel that your life is as valuable as someone who is moral. Morality has within it certain things that seem to be universal, regardless of religious beliefs.

Generally, if you infringe on my rights, you have exceeded yours. This brings us to the idea that rights come with responsibility. You have the responsibility not to infringe on my rights, and if I have the right to live, I have the responsibility to stay alive to the best of my ability. We both have the responsibility to protect the lives of others, and that requires us to make decisions on who to protect and who to protect them from. In other words, we have to have the morality to decide who is the bad guy and who is the good guy to decide who has priority.

I do not think that anyone has the right to take that responsibility away from me. I am not saying just that they can't take away my right to live, but that they cannot take away my responsibility to others.

The US Government has within it certain factions who think they can and will and they are being influenced by people in other countries and members of the United Nations. They are not doing this on any moral basis. If they were, how could they say, "Give me your sons and daughters, so that they can go to another country, to kill people in order to protect the innocent. They may die in the process, but because we belong to the UN, we have the right and responsibility to do this." And then turn around and tell you that you do not have the right to have a gun in your home in order to protect your family, who you would rightly consider to be innocent and a priority, when a man in a ski mask comes through your door with a gun or knife or crow bar?

The government is telling us that they have the right to decide our sons and daughters are expendable, in order to protect innocents, that they have the right to require our children to kill in order to protect the innocent, but you and I who were considered intelligent enough to elect them, do not have the right to do that.

It does not really matter whether or not you believe that it is o.k. for ordinary citizens to own guns. What the real issue is here, is whether or not we want to allow people we elected to have that right if we do not.

The politicians have muddied up the water on this issue so much that people either believe that every life, no matter how worthless it is, should be saved, or they believe that everybody else but them is less valuable. Neither is morally right. Many people believe that the only reason human life is superior to say, a cow, is that we are better at killing than cows are and that rights don't factor into it. This devalues the cow and the man. Man has a greater value than the cow, but he has the responsibility to only kill the cow if necessary, and the right to decide for himself when it is necessary, based on those universal truths I spoke of previously. You can't find many people who will tell you that the desire to see blood and inflict pain on the cow are necessary. So, it could be easily said that it was a universal truth that it is not necessary to kill a cow under those circumstances.

At some point, mankind needs to determine, once and for all whether or not abortion is murder, because if it is, then those who kill abortion doctors to prevent murder, are not much different than a US soldier killing the enemy to prevent their government from committing atrocities against their own people. The only difference is that we have been programmed to believe that our government is much wiser than we are and they alone can make such decisions, But if they are elected by ignorant incapable men and women, are they not a defective system? Rather than teaching that in order to be a good citizen, you have to obey your government, we need to teach our children, that if you seek public offices, you are accountable to your electorate just as much as they are to you.

The very reason we have multiple branches of government was because the Founding Fathers knew that sometimes, the rights of the majority, would tend to overrule the rights of the minority unjustifiably. You might be the lone voice crying in the wilderness, but that does not mean you are wrong. Stop giving your voice to the government. When they speak for you, they need to be sure they have your support.

If society is corrupt, then the police officers that are drawn from it, are corrupt. A badge does not impart divinity.

Do we really want our government or any other one to have the same authority and power that Hitler had?

"This year will go down in history! For the first time, a civilized nation has full gun registration! Our streets will be safer, our police more efficient, and the world will follow our lead into the future!"
---Adolf Hitler 1935

These same governments, which I quoted, like our US Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights, European governments, the United Nations, etc. that have said we have the right to life, want to take away our right to defend it.

I maintain that if we should not have guns, then neither should the police, government or military, because they come from within our ranks. In the same vein, law enforcement personnel ought to stop lobbying for gun control laws, else they find themselves patrolling the streets with billy clubs and no guns. Look to England for an example.

The United Nations could enforce gun control on us even if we don't sign the treaty, by saying that if laws were considered standard in all other member nations, then it is binding on us too. In 2008, the only two countries that voted against establishing these international norms, were the US and Zimbabwe.

These people try to say that small arms are what are killing people in wars. That is a bunch of malarchy or our government is wasting a lot of money on big guns. We didn't go to Iraq to take hand guns, we went to find 'weopons of mass destruction'. Don't be foolish enough to assume that wars are fueled by small arms trade. They will use small arms if they have to, but the difference between men and boys has always been the size of their toys, and they will work to acquire big guns, as more cost effective.

Proponents of international gun control try to say that there are no laws already in place to deter  gun trade. Yes, there are, people just break them, with the sanction of those same government officials who want to take our gun rights. Iran and Iraq supposedly had weopons laws and treaties, which they broke. Look to the the history of our own government and the Iran-Contra scandal and the more recent problem of the Mexican Drug Cartels using guns that our government gave to them. A Drug-War Plan Goes Awry American citizens didn't do that. Uncle Sam did.

What does Barack Obama support?

  • Endorsed a complete ban on handgun ownership in Illinois.
  • Supports gun bans in any city that wants one, including Chicago and Washington, D.C.
  • Wants to totally eliminate the right of concealed carry nationwide.
  • Voted to make it possible to prosecute innocent citizens who use firearms in self-defense.
  • Voted to allow predatory lawsuits intended to bankrupt the firearms industry.
  • Wants to bring back the failed Clinton assault weapons ban, discredited even by Clinton's own supporters.
  • Voted to ban virtually every type of rifle ammunition used for hunting and sport.
  • Supports gun registration for law-abiding gun owners.
  • Refused to sign a friend-of-the-court brief affirming that the Second Amendment refers to an individual right.
  • Served on the Board of Directors of the Joyce Foundation, the number one source of funds for anti-gun organizations.
  • Supported a ban on gun stores within five miles of any school or park, which would practically eliminate every gun store in the country.
  • Voted to prevent gun owners from knowing when the state of Illinois ran record searches on them.
  • Supports forcing gun manufacturers to embrace micro-stamping, a financially ruinous and technically absurd farce.
  • Wants to create and enforce mandatory waiting periods, under the assumption that only angry people buy firearms.
  • Supports the ludicrous one-gun-a-month rule on gun sales.
  • Supports banning cheap handguns, which would affect black and poor Americans the most, constituencies he claims to champion.
  • Supports banning police departments from reselling firearms, even if the money raised would help purchase new equipment.
  • Supports mandatory firearms training for all gun owners regardless of the cost or consequences.
  • Supports a ban on gun ownership for anyone under 21 years of age, which would help weaken the American hunting tradition.
So, we have him on record saying that we have the right to self defense so long as we don't use a gun to do it. He supports, taking away states rights, by allowing cities to enact laws that are counter to the state gun laws and enact federal laws that override state laws. We ought to be able to sue gun companies. Hello! Why can't we sue GM if a drunk uses a car to kill someone? He wants to ban hunting ammunition. Again, you have the right to live, but not to eat in order to do it. He is willing to resort to sneaky methods of running gun stores out of business. He wants a police officer to be able to violate your rights and run a background search on you in secret, without cause. That has gotten police officers fired for pulling that little trick, in the state of Ohio. If your children are going to learn to hunt, they will have to use your guns to do it, because he doesn't think they should own their own. Poor people won't be able to legally own guns because he wants to jack the prices up on guns.

Rest assured, someone other than Barack came up with these ideas and he is just the puppet, with someone's hand up his rear, moving his mouth.

The UN Gun laws would make more guns illegal than people think. There are many people who have received guns as part of an inheritance passed down for several generations. These guns were made before there was any such thing as registration. If you don't know much about guns, you may be unaware that some guns that require you to pull the trigger, each and every time, can still use a magazine. Any gun with a magazine is deemed a no-no by the UN. There will also be massively large amounts of money, that have to be spent in order to register your guns, in order to see if you are allowed to keep them.

The Supreme Court made a ruling today that says that parents have the right to decide whether or not their children play certain video games, so why do we not have the right to defend their bodies as well as their minds?

The Declaration of Independence asserts that it is sometimes necessary to disagree with your government and if your government are the only ones with guns, how do you go about that? The very first thing the British Government did, was to try and confiscate all of the Patriots' weopons. They had to hide them down wells and bury them.

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.---Thomas Jefferson

Suicide and euthanasia are not as simple as they used to be, thanks to advances in modern medicine. I learned a few years ago, when my grandfather was on life support, that they have medications that literally force your heart to go on beating, indefinitely. If you want to stay off of life support, you better get that in writing, because, if you don't some doctor will be making that call. Their decision will be based on money.

I knew a man who believed in life support, having gone through open heart by-pass surgery, two times in ten years, had the arteries in his neck lower abdomen, and legs replaced by artificial ones and having survived several strokes. He had been on life support many times, only to recover. But when he was in his last days, he wanted to die, and his wife would not allow him to be disconnected from life support, because she said that she did not have the right to decide who lived or died, that only God did. But, I believe that we not only have the right to decide that in certain instances, we have the responsibility. If you believe in God, then he would have been able to maintain the life of the man without life-support, if that were in his divine plan.
Until someone forces me to give up my responsibility to protect my life and those of others, lives that they have a right to, then I will maintain my right to use lethal force to do so.

Forget the Dog, Beware the Owner.