The History and Practice of Eugenics, PT 9

The Codex Alimentarius

http://www.codexalimentarius.org/

The altruistic purpose of this commission is in "protecting health of the consumers and ensuring fair trade practices in the food trade, and promoting coordination of all food standards work undertaken by international governmental and non-governmental organizations".

It is run jointly by the Food and Agricultural Organization and the World Health Organization. What actually happens through them is that corporations make more money off of food and control us through food. Obviously, if you control the food, you control the people. The Us is the chair of Codex.

The Codex organization is working toward regulating everything we eat and drink including water. They will implement their regulations in every country that belongs to the World Trade Organization. If these countries do not follow them, then they will face trade sanctions.

Regulations as of December 2009:

* All nutrients (vitamins and minerals) are to be considered toxins/poisons and are to be removed from all food because Codex prohibits the use of nutrients to "prevent, treat or cure any condition or disease"

* All food (including organic) is to be irradiated, removing all toxic nutrients from food (unless eaten locally and raw).

* Nutrients allowed will be limited to a Positive List developed by Codex which will include such beneficial nutrients like Fluoride (3.8 mg daily) developed from environmental waste. All other nutrients will be prohibited nationally and internationally to all Codex-compliant countries .

* All nutrients (e.g., CoQ10, Vitamins A, B, C, D, Zinc and Magnesium) that have any positive health impact on the body will be deemed illegal under Codex and are to be reduced to amounts negligible to humans' health .

* You will not even be able to obtain these anywhere in the world even with a prescription.

* All advice on nutrition (including written online or journal articles or oral advice to a friend, family member or anyone) will be illegal. This includes naturalnews.com reports on vitamins and minerals and all nutritionist's consultations.

* All dairy cows are to be treated with Monsanto's recombinant bovine growth hormone.

* All animals used for food are to be treated with potent antibiotics and exogenous growth hormones.

* The reintroduction of deadly and carcinogenic organic pesticides that in 1991, 176 countries (including the U.S.) have banned worldwide including 7 of the 12 worst at the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pesticides (e.g., Hexachlorobenzene, Toxaphene, and Aldrin) will be allowed back into food at elevated levels .

* Dangerous and toxic levels (0.5 ppb) of aflotoxin in milk produced from moldy storage conditions of animal feed will be allowed. Aflotoxin is the second most potent (non-radiation) carcinogenic compound known to man.

* Mandatory use of growth hormones and antibiotics on all food herds, fish and flocks

* Worldwide implementation of unlabeled GMOs into crops, animals, fish and trees.

* Elevated levels of residue from pesticides and insecticides that are toxic to humans and animals.

Some examples of potential permissible safe levels of nutrients under Codex include :

* Niacin - upper limits of 34 mcg daily (effective daily doses include 2000 to 3000 mcgs).

* Vitamin C - upper limits of 65 to 225 mcg daily (effective daily doses include 6000 to 10000 mcgs).

* Vitamin D - upper limits of 5 μg daily (effective daily doses include 6000 to 10000 μg).

* Vitamin E - upper limits of 15 IU of alpha tocopherol only per day, even though alpha tocopherol by itself has been implicated in cell damage and is toxic to the body (effective daily doses of mixed tocopherols include 10000 to 12000 IU).

In 1995, the Food and Drug Administration changed their policy and it stated that international standards, i.e. Codex, would supercede US laws, if US laws were incomplete. This is essentially illegal to make some other governing body superior to US law. But in 2004, the US passed the Central American Free Trade Agreement, which required US regulations to meet Codex standards by 2009.

Effectively, we cannot get rid of these regulations as long as we belong to the WTO. It is believed that the purpose of this, is to control population, through food, with the aid of Big Pharma and the US government. The FAO and WHO estimate that the vitamin regulation will reduce popularized by 3 million.

The more natural things we eat for health or take for health, the more we cut into Big Pharma's profits.

IF proper science were being used, biochemistry would be used to assess nutrients. Instead, Codex uses Risk Assessment, which is a branch of toxicology. Because they want us to view nutrients as toxins.

The Codex Alimentarius Vitamin and Mineral Guideline, can ban high potency vitamins, by setting standards for dosages or supplements added to food extremely low.

The DSHEA, Dietary Supplement Health Education Act of 1994 classifed supplements as food. But Codex supercedes that and calls supplements a drug or toxins, by referring to levels of them as dosages.

So Codex violates a US law with an international law.

I looked around to see what kind of news stories I could find on Codex. I found one that says Argentina joined the International Olive Oil Commission in order to prove that their olive oil was authentic, even though it is different that the oils from Mediterranean countries. The information was found in Codex documents. Things like that are important because the prices of olive oil are down right now.http://www.oliveoiltimes.com/olive-oil-business/olive-oil-prices-lowest-since-2009/27024

Despite the fact that Codex has regulations about putting things like GMO's on the market without testing them, that is exactly what happened in the US. And Codex has done nothing about it. So obviously, they are not really out for our best interests, and someone else is calling the shots, like maybe Monsanto. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dave-murphy/dan-quayle-and-michael-ta_b_1551732.html

Greenpeace did a study on the vegetables in our grocery stores and found levels of toxins and chemicals at seven times what Codex allows. Yet where is Codex when they could be useful?http://asiancorrespondent.com/82758/contaminated-veggies-switch-organic-produce/

I looked around for some of the more recent videos on Codex alimentarius, so I could post them here.

In 2009, in the mother of all conflicts of interest, Obama appointed Michael Taylor as a senior advisor for the FDA. He had previously served as vice president at Monsanto. Among other things that they do, Monsanto in a leader in GMO, genetically modified foods. He was also the food Czar at the FDA when GMO's were first allowed onto the market, without any testing at all to determine their safety.

Monsanto markets genetically modified corn that is insect resistant. In Europe, six countries from the EU refuse to allow it to be grown in their countries. The EU has been highly resistant towards any GMO's. Corn or corn products are in everything. The Monsanto corn has pesticide in the seeds, and now there are indications that bugs are becoming resistant to the pesticides, so why keep them in there if they don't work or are starting to fail? It is estimated that before they started making this modified corn, it cost farmers about $1 million a year in damaged crops and pesticide costs.

Monsanto's corn is engineered to produce the Cry3Bb1 protein from Bacillus thuringiensis, or Bt, a natural insecticide. There is also SmartStax corn that has an additional chemical from Dow Chemical and Dupont. SmartStax corn has eight different genetically modified traits in it. Prior to it's development, the most any other product had was three. The corn produces six insecticide toxins and is tolerant to 2 herbicides.

Monsanto also makes seeds for corn, soybeans and cotton, that have Round Up in them. But weeds are becoming resistant to that also.http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-06-15/monsanto-corn-injured-by-early-rootworm-feeding-in-illinois

One of their newer products is GMO drought resistant corn. They developed it in partnership with BASF. It was approved earlier this year. The USDA said, "corn and progeny derived from it are unlikely to pose plant pest risks and is no longer to be considered regulated article under APHIS’ Biotechnology Regulations." and "would have no significant impacts, individually or collectively, on the quality of the human environment and will have no effect on federally listed threatened or endangered species, species proposed for listing, or their designated or proposed critical habitats."

The Cornucopia Institute reported that the USDA received almost 45,000 public comments opposed to MON 87460, with only 23 comments in favor. Apparently, this had little or no impact on Obama or Secretary of Agriculture Vilsack.

Now they are wanting to sell corn that is resistant to 2, 4-D, which was the primary ingredient in Agent Orange. If that doesn't sit well with you, the USDA is taking public comments on it, but whether or not your comment will matter is unlikely, given that they didn't listen to people opposed to MON 87460.

http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=APHIS-2010-0103-0001http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=APHIS-2010-0103-0001

When I was growing up, my Grandmother told me how they had a cow that was solely to provide my Dad milk. This would be unpasteurized and unprocessed milk. But the FDA is conducting armed raids on farmers who produce and sell unpasteurized milk. Michael Taylor is responsible for these raids.http://www.change.org/petitions/president-obama-dump-former-monsanto-lobbyist-as-fda-food-safety-czarhttp://www.change.org/petitions/president-obama-dump-former-monsanto-lobbyist-as-fda-food-safety-czar

Taylor's job at the FDA has been on again off again, because part of the time he works for companies like Monsanto. In1994, he wrote the labeling guidelines for dairy products that have the hormone rBGH in them. So that these products wouldn't be stigmatized, he forced companies that make products without rBGH state on their labels that rGBH wasn't any different than the naturally occurring hormone, so people would think that their product wasn't any better because it didn't contain it.

Before he was able to do this, as a lawyer for Monsanto, he advised them on whether or not it would be legal for states to institute such labeling regulations, and whether or not Monsanto would be able to sue

other companies for telling people that their products were rGBH free. So while in the private sector, he worked out the legalities, and through his public position he worked out the logistics and implemented the program.

Taylor is not the only person who goes in and out the revolving doors between Monsanto, the FDA, and the EPAhttp://www.rense.com/general33/fd.htmhttp://www.rense.com/general33/fd.htm

Both of my children had trouble tolerating infant formula, so they had to be switched to soy formula. Now soybeans are GMO's and soy allergies went up by 50% when GMO soy products were introduced to the UK. So, if your child is lactose intolerant, or allergic to dairy, and they are allergic to soy, what are you to do, especially if breast feeding wasn't an option. In my case I was on massive doses of antibiotics for a year after my son was born, and the medicine would have passed into breast milk.

One of the types of genetic modifications in food, is antibiotics. We hear all sorts of statements that germs are antibiotic resistant due to doctors over prescribing antibiotics. But is more likely, that the antibiotics in our food cause it. For one thing if those genes transfer to bacteria in your digestive tract, then it would modify the bacteria and make it resistant. Now with the idea that gene transfer is possible, what happens if GMO pesticides in corn transfer within our digestive tract, we would be turning the bacteria inside us into pesticide factories. No tests have been done to see if these GMO genes do transfer, but it is scientifically possible. The American Academy of Environment Sciences doesn't think GMO's are safe. “Several animal studies indicate serious health risks associated with GM food,” including infertility, immune problems, accelerated aging, faulty insulin regulation, and changes in major organs and the gastrointestinal system. The AAEM asked physicians to advise patients to avoid GM foods."

It sounds to me like a good way to lower the population, to make people infertile, vulnerable to disease because of damaged immune systems, increase their risk of diabetes, cause organ damage, and cause them to die early.

At least sugar, fat and salt in food makes it taste better, the GMO's usually don't unless you count the new ones that are specifically made for that out of fetal cells. If someone handed you two boxes, one that contained an all natural herbicide and one that contained an all natural pesticide, would you eat them?

Here's a link to a current news story about people signing petitions to get rid of Michael Taylor. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/blogpost/post/monsanto-petition-tells-obama-cease-fda-ties-to-monsanto/2012/01/30/gIQAA9dZcQ_blog.html

Here's the petition if you would like to sign ithttp://signon.org/sign/tell-obama-to-cease-fda

One of the most telling things I found out about Monsanto GMO's was that they had been busted on the fact that they don't serve them to their employees in their cafeterias. Bill Gates follows the same practice. And so do the Rockefellershttp://templestream.xanga.com/759470927/gates-and-rockefeller-cafeterias-reject-monsanto-ge-foods/

This brings us around to David Rockefeller, and good old Bill and Melinda Gates again. In February 2012, he was at a press conference hyping up his digital revolution of the food supply in Rome. The reporters asked him about GMO's and he replied,"You should go out and talk to people growing rice and say do they mind that it was created in a laboratory when their child has enough to eat?” I suppose right at the moment they were filling their children's bellies, they might not mind, but if you gave them a choice between GMO's and organic food, they wouldn't opt for the GMO's. Their cafeterias are organic too.

AGRA or the Alliance for A Green Revolution in Africa, is jointly funded by the Rockefeller and Bill and Melinda Gates Foundations. Thanks to them, cassava, which is a staple food in Africa, is now GMO cassava. Monsanto also introduced GMO corn into Africa through the WEMA or Water Efficient Maize for Africa program. The Bill Gates Foundation and Warren Buffet both supported it. Rockefeller University's website says it only serves rGBH free milk, cage free eggs and organic food. The Gates Foundation owns stock in Monsantohttp://templestream.xanga.com/759470927/gates-and-rockefeller-cafeterias-reject-monsanto-ge-foods/

They are all members of the so called Doomsday Seed Vault in the Arctic. This is a stash of unmodified seeds, ostensibly just in case of some environment catastrophe. But the reality is that they don't want seeds to be sold or grown that they don't have the patents on. http://www.globalresearch.ca/PrintArticle.php?articleId=10300

In India, it is being reported that there is an epidemic of suicide among farmers. These farmers are told that they will become rich if they switch to growing GMO crops. But when droughts and other things cause their crops to fail, they are deeply in dept because they have to borrow money to buy these seeds from Monsanto. Their government has encouraged these farmers to opt into GMO crops, because in return for doing so, India received International Money Fund loans back in the eighties and nineties. These loans helped the economy of the cities at the expense of lives.

They were told that they wouldn't have to use pesticides, but instead, their cotton crops were ravaged by boll worms. They were not told that these crops require more water, and then they were hit with droughts.

All through history, farmers have saved seeds to replant next year, but with GMO seeds, they don't produce seeds that can be planted. So, the farmers have to buy new seeds every year. As a result of the plight of these poor Indian farmers, Prince Charles is setting up the Bhumi Vardaan Foundation. It will promote organic crops.http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1082559/The-GM-genocide-Thousands-Indian-farmers-committing-suicide-using-genetically-modified-crops.html

In the US, Monsanto even made sure that farmers who tried to grow crops that would allow them to save seeds for the next year would be penalized for doing so. In 2011, they won a court case that was begun back in 2007 against an Indiana farmer named, Vernon Bowman. They said he infringed on their patent by saving seeds that had some of the Monsanto seeds mixed in with them for replanting. Bowman said he bought the seeds in part of some mixed commodity seeds. Commodity seeds are not required to differentiate between GMO and non GMO seeds.

The court ruled that Monsanto's agreement with farmers prohibits them from selling the progeny of Round Up Ready seeds, that it didn't prohibit the sale of second generation seeds. But farmers are not allowed to plant those same seeds in the ground in order to grow more seeds to sell. http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/09/21/us-monsanto-lawsuit-idUSTRE78K79O20110921

Monsanto has been tracking down farmers all over the Midwest and suing them for saving seeds. They have a toll free hotline where people can make anonymous tips about farmers who are cleaning and saving seeds. The farmers have to sign a contract that says they won't do that, but instead buy new seeds every year from Monsanto. These contracts say how much GMO Round Up Ready acres they plant. Monsanto also runs television and radio adds to encourage people to turn in their neighbors. When they get a tip, they send out detectives to go through the farmers records and over their farms looking for evidence. They look to see how much seed they bought and how much they sold. Monsanto sues the farmers that if feels it can prove have saved seeds. They say the money they will goes to American Farm Bureau for scholarships.

Monsanto says that they are just trying to protect the millions of dollars that they have invested in the research and development of their products. But the National Family Farm Coalition filed a suit, that claims that they are just trying to monopolize the sale of seeds, and that they fix prices so that they can create and maintain this monopoly.

Some of the court cases have claimed that after the second generation of seeds, the patent exhausts itself. Others have claimed that Monsanto cannot patent plants, which self replicate in the first place; saying that patent law was established for machines and things that someone invented.

In 1970, Congress enacted the Plant Variety Protection Act. Under that act, farmers could save seeds. But a Supreme Court case said that companies like Monsanto could patent GMO'shttp://www.organicconsumers.org/Monsanto/farmerssued.cfm

Monsanto is following the lead of Big Pharma with regard to patents. It's patent on the Round Up Ready soy beans is due to run out in 2014. Under normal circumstances, that would allow competition from other companies. But rather than allow that to happen, they have already come up with Round Up Ready 2 and are forcing it on the market, so that the Round Up Ready 1 seed will be obsolete, and they will maintain their monopoly. This is the tactic that pharmaceutical companies use. They will modify an existing medicine slightly, give it a new name and extend their time before the patent runs out. This makes the consumer have to wait years before there is an affordable generic available.

Farmers would like to be able to start saving their seeds when the patent runs out, but it will be difficult to find seeds that only contain Round Up Ready 1, so that they won't violate the patent. Cross pollination is a very real possibility, because even Monsanto can't control the wind, or contamination that occurs via animals. In a bit of false magnanimity, Monsanto says it won't try to keep farmers from saving seed. But they know how hard it will be to find only Round Up Ready 1 seeds, which is why, Monsanto is trying to get the new Round Up Ready on the market now. They also didn't start saying that until the Justice Department started investigating them for antitrust law violation. It has been reported that they were not going to re-license companies to use the RoundUp Ready 1 gene, which will force them to buy the Round Up Ready 2 gene. But with the Justice Department looking at them, they backed down on that, but only in the U.S.

There are farmers who need to be able to establish that their crops are organic, because they sell to companies like Whole Food Market. And they are suing Monsanto, because their GMO's are contaminating their crops, and they say, that Monsanto can then claim their crops are GMO's. So, far they have been unsuccessful, because they have been unable to prove in court that Monsanto threatened them. But if they had gone about it, just by saying that Monsanto had contaminated their crops they might have won. Either way, it is highly doubtful that Monsanto ever intended for their product not to cross pollinate with non GMO fields. And that is significant when you realize that it is not just soy beans, but corn and cotton that they are monopolizing.

Other countries require GMO patents to be renewed periodically, and Monsanto intends to maintain those licenses until 2017. American farmers would not be allowed to sell seeds to those countries, which would probably cause them not to want to grow crops that they can't export.

In 2005, the Brazilian government made GMO soybeans legal. But they did this because it was shown that about 75% of the crops were grown from Round Up Ready seeds, made by Monsanto. Round Up ready crops have been modified so that it can be sprayed on them without hurting the plants.

Since the crops were now legal, Monsanto started charging the farmers 2% of the sales of the soy beans. The amount of farmers growing these GMO soybeans was now up to 85%. And they test all of the crops to make sure who is growing them. If the farmer claims that his crops are not the Round Up Ready soy beans, and they prove that they are, he has to pay 3% of his profits.

Monsanto says that the farmers are getting the Round Up Ready seeds illegally. The Brazilian Association of Seeds and Seedlings, says they are not. In April, the Brazilian courts said that they were charging this 2-3 percent illegally, and ordered them to pay it back. Right now, it is in appealhttp://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/18/monsanto-brazil-soybean-farmers_n_1606267.html

Monsanto does not want us using bio-fuels like hemp and sugarcane. Hemp doesn't require insecticides, or phosphate fertilizer. So that would cut down on their profits. Instead, they prefer that we grow their corn, which requires their pesticide.

Whether or not you believe in legalized marijuana/hemp. The reason it is not already legal, may not have anything to do with drug usage. It is estimated that 1 acre of hemp could yield more paper than 2-4 acres of trees. Even though we are living in the digital age, we still need paper, and the demand for it will continue to grow. If we don't find another source for it, we will have massive deforestation. This in turn will have environment results, which ultimately will cause declines in population.

Even cars can and have been made from hemp based plastic. Ford made one in 1941. This hemp plastic is supposed to be 10 times stronger than steel. Only half of the oil we import is for fuel. The other half is for plastic manufacturing. It is ironic that organizations like PETA want us to use pleather, without realizing that by using something that is a petroleum product, we injure far more animals than those who might lose their fur on a farm. And what about the children who starve or get cancer. But save the animals?

Viscoloid Corporation was established in 1900 to make celluloid which was basically plastic. About 25 years later Dupont bought it. Another company that made celluloid was Fiberloid, which was bought out by Monsanto. I.F. Farben's Hoechst-Celanese, also makes plastic. And everyone know that plastic is related to petroleum and therefore the Rockefellers. Round Up is made with Rockefeller fossil fuels, as evidenced by it's chemical name, glyphosate.

I am not sure if I mentioned this before, but Supreme Court Justice, Clarence Thomas used to be a lawyer for Monsanto in the 1970's. He wrote the majority opinion that Monsanto's GMO's were patentable under U.S. patent law.

Recombinant Bovine Growth Hormone or rBGH is the Monsanto growth hormone that causes cows to produce more milk. It was approved by the FDA in 1993. The EU, and Canada, as well as other countries have banned it's use. The American Cancer Society says that it is not the rGBH that we should be concerned with but IGF-1, insulin-like growth factor, which is linked to all sorts of cancer. They say it is also in soy milk. This brings up an interesting point, is IGF-1 in Monsantos soy products? It would seem so. IGF-1 is not destroyed by pasteurization.

The FDA prohibits dairies from claiming that milk with rGBH is different than any other milk. Because rGBH injected cows get more mastitis, they have to be given antibiotics. Monsanto was accused of trying to bribe scientists in order to get rBGH milk approved in Canada. http://www.ethicalinvesting.com/monsanto/news/10009.htm Kroger and Walmart have chosen not to sell store brands of milk with rGBH in it.

Wall Street, Big Business and Money, And the Money Making Machine of Big Pharma and Cancer Treatment

I recently saw a chart posted on my facebook wall
showing where much of the money in the world is spent.

I feel great frustration with people's obsession with money and Wall Street.
Wall Street is the right entity to be angry with, but money is the wrong thing
to be angry about. It pales in comparison to some of their greater sins.

One of the things on those charts says that cancer treatment costs as
much as we spend on cigarettes. In case you wonder why, it's because the Rockefellers
invented cancer research, development and treatment, as well as starting the
cancer society. In the process they did some pretty monstrous things to patients;
Frankenstein type things. In the 1940's the Journal of American Medicine's
largest advertising client was Philip Morris. Camel cigarettes had the largest
booth at the AMA's convention in 1948. Many of their so called treatments are
actually carcinogenic and cause cancer. For instance Tamoxifen has been
proven to only delay onset of cancer and to actually increase uterine
cancer in those under 50. The head of the National Cancer Institute had to
resign after it came out. Yet the dirty FDA still allows it to be sold.

We pay taxes that fund cancer drug research. Then the drugs are handed over
to drug companies who make money hand over fist without paying back any of the taxes.

One of the first dirty things the Rockefellers did in respect to cancer was sell
a drug made out of petroleum as a cure. The Rockefellers had a big part in the development of established medicine in this country. They promoted the use of petro-pharmaceuticals, drugs made from by-products of the petroleum industry.

Imperial Chemicals is one of the companies that make things that cause breast cancer. They have
a subsidiary company called Zeneca Pharmaceuticals that makes chemicals used in cancer treatment.
They also make Tamoxifen. One of the fastest way to have your product be successful is to create
a market for it. Tamoxifen treats a cancer they caused. The treatment causes cancer and then
they get to treat your cancer again. Of course it is for a price.

"This is no accident," Dr. Epstein writes. "Zeneca Pharmaceuticals--a spin-off of Imperial Chemical Industries is one of the world's largest manufacturers of chlorinated and other industrial chemicals, including those incriminated as causes of breast cancer.

Zeneca has also been the sole multimillion-dollar funder of the National Breast Cancer Awareness Month since its inception in 1984, besides the sole manufacturer of Tamoxifen, the world's top-selling anticancer and breast cancer "prevention" drug, with $400 million in annual sales.

Furthermore, Zeneca recently assumed direct management of 11 cancer centers in U.S. hospitals. Zeneca owns a 50 percent stake in these centers known collectively as Salick Health Care."

Epstein's book info can be found here:http://www.preventcancer.com/documents/ACS.pdf


Of course, since their funding comes from chemical companies through the drug companies they own, the ACS and
National Cancer Institute are not going to focus much on what prevents cancer. That might offend their sponsers.

"Giant corporations, which profited handsomely while they polluted air, water, the workplace, and food with a wide range of carcinogens, remain greatly comforted by the silence of the ACS. This silence reflected a complex of mindsets fixated on diagnosis, treatment, and basic genetic research, together with ignorance, indifference, and even hostility to prevention."

"Not surprisingly, the incidence of cancer over past decades has escalated, approximately parallel to its increased funding," Dr. Epstein writes.

"Every discoverer of a cancer remedy has encountered a Chinese wall of resistance," which has been the same in every page of recorded cancer history, and that the myth that the discoverer of a cancer cure would be "honored, acclaimed, and practically deified as a saviour of the human race," should be changed to "dishonored, denounced and crucified, unless he is a fair haired boy of the dominating oligarchy." THE CANCER BLACKOUT An Illuminating, Factual Survey by M. H. Clutter, D.R.L

Don't get me started on the fact that when you donate to them, just like many other charities, the money mostly
pays for executives running the show. All the while the cancer rate is tripling, not dropping. That's because we
continue to be exposed to chemicals, in our environment, in processed foods, and personal care products. They sell
us food that causes cancer, heart disease, and diabetes, again making a market for their drugs.

"A solution to cancer would mean the termination of research programs, the obsolescence of skills, the end of dreams of personal glory, triumph over cancer would dry up contributuions to self-perpetrating charities...It would mortally threaten the present clinical establishments by rendering obsolete the expensive surgical, radiological and chemotherapeutic treatments in which so much money, training and equipment is invested...The new therapy must be disbelieved, denied, discouraged and disallowed at all costs, regardless of actual testing results, and preferably without any testing at all."---Robert Houston and Gary Null

Mammography is another of their dirty little secrets. The ACS promotes mammography heavily, because they are heavily funded by the industries that profit from it such as, Siemens, DuPont, General Electric, Eastman Kodak and Piker.Several of their presidents have been radiologists. These companies have members on the ACS's advisory boards. And of course they donate and quite a bit of the research conducted by the them is used by the ACS without
regard to the fact that it's results would be biased.

The American Cancer Society was formed by an advertising executive and a drug
company CEO. They actually have a special committee to seek and destroy any
treatment not endorsed by them.

The AMA licenses doctors, which means they can pull the license of a doctor
who does not use one of their endorsed treatments. They tend to defer to
the American Cancer Society(ACS)on what they endorse. The ACS and FDA
work hand in glove with the pharmaceutical companies. The AMA gets its funding
from the Big Pharma. Healing Cancer Naturally

In the 1850's the AMA launched a political campaign against abortion. Prior to this time abortion had been legal and it didn't even catch much flack from the Catholic Church so long as it was done in the early stages of pregnancy, before movement could be felt. Their campaign hit full speed in the 1860's, when they began calling abortionists murderers and executioners. Between 1875 and 1900, every state except Kentucky banned abortion. Women began dying in the hundreds of thousands from complications of back alley abortion. The AMA also was against birth control of any other form. They were not really very pious and their motivations were not very altruistic. Their internal memorandums showed that they were not concerned with the sanctity of life. Their true cause was running women healers out of the business. Midwives were frequently who women went to see for contraception and abortion.

At the same time the AMA began it's persecution of homeopaths. There were books published that ran down the idea of any form of alternative medicine, and the AMA forbade it's members to associate with homeopaths. Then they began having homeopaths expelled from medical societies.

It took the AMA quite some time to get rid of homeopathic medicine. People were very responsive to the idea of any treatment that didn't require them to take large doses of medicine that made them ill, required being bled, or surgery. But some people preferred the quick fix of popping a pill to the time consuming homeopathic treatment.It is harder to take care of yourself in order to prevent or fix damage than it is to take a pill later.

In 1910 a man named Abraham Flexner wrote the "Flexner Report" funded by the Carnegie Foundation. The Carnegie Foundation is closely tied to the Rockefeller Foundation. After this report, medical schools who were approved of by Flexner, received funding from the Carnegies and Rockefellers, not so if Flexner did not approve of a school. He had first worked for the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. While Flexner was with the Carnegie Foundation, he had done a study on the possible modernization of medical schools. Within the Rockefeller machine, The General Education Board, he would find the money to put his ideas to work.The AMA saw the writing on the wall and allied itself with the money.

For more on Flexner see The Socialist Takeover Of The Public School System And The Plan To Teach Us To Conform

State boards through Rockefeller influence denied licenses to doctors that were not from AMA approved schools. Between 1900 and 1917, the number of homeopathic colleges dropped from 22 to 7. The AMA also closed medical schools for women and blacks. While there were some benefits to this standardization of medicine like making sure that doctors were properly educated in good science, the reason for it was consolidation of power and money. John D. Rockefeller chose not to take the drugs his foundations promoted. His doctor was a homeopath. He lived until he was almost 100 years old.

"...a surgeon told John D. (Rockefeller) that everyone should have an appendectomy before the age of 16 as a preventative. The oil wizard saw the point at once. 'Why, you've got a better thing than Standard Oil!', he exclaimed." - In Nat Morris, The Cancer Blackout.

They learned how to control what was taught in the medical schools and began to apply the pricipals to the public education system as well. The Socialist Takeover Of The Public School System And The Plan To Teach Us To Conform

They established an organization called the General Education Board, part of the Rockefeller Foundation, and John D. Rockefeller, Sr. donated $1 Million dollars to it, initially, and it then became absorbed into the Slater and Peabody Funds.

Frederick Taylor Gates: "The object of this Association is to provide a vehicle through which capitalists of the North who sincerely desire to assist in the great work of Southern education may act with assurance that their money will be wisely used."

Frederick Taylor Gates: "In our dreams, we have limitless resources and the people yield themselves with perfect docility to our molding bands. The present education conventions fade from their minds, and unhampered by tradition, we work our own good will upon a grateful and responsive rural folk. We shall not try to make these people or any of their children into philosophers or men of learning, or men of science. We have not to raise up from among them authors, editors, poets or men of letters. We shall not search for embryo great artists, painters, musicians nor lawyers, doctors, preachers, politicians, statesmen, of whom we have an ample supply.
The task we set before ourselves is very simple as well as a very beautiful one, to train these people as we find them to a perfectly ideal life just where they are. So we will organize our children and teach them to do in a perfect way the things their fathers and mothers are doing in an imperfect way, in the homes, in the shops and on the farm." From one of the Board's Newsletters.

Modern medicine, including, psychology, psychiatry, cancer tretments, drugs and also educational methods, are a result of the fact that his money was almost limitless, and J.D. Rockefeller, Sr. had a desire to enhance his public relations, through philanthropy. The science and morals behind these systems is very dubious. The Socialist Takeover Of The Public School System And The Plan To Teach Us To Conform


The Rockefellers and the AMA are all about public relations. Rockefeller began his foundations because he had a bad image as a murderer and a robber baron after some of his miners were machine gunned to death for not marching to his tune. His advisors suggested that he start foundations to give away some of his money, to avoid paying taxes and get some good P.R. in the process. The AMA came under fire for the fact that the JAMA was being primarily funded by drug adds, which violated the AMA's code of ethics. In 1899 George Simmons was hired as the new editor of the JAMA and he formed an alliance with the drug industry, which made the JAMA highly profitable.

At this time the AMA began accepting money in order to give a drug it's "seal of approval." Abbott Laboratories found another method for getting approval. Wallace Abbott investigated Simmons and found out that he had dubious medical credentials and had been charged with sexual abuse of his patients.He got his approval for free.(Mullins, Murder by Injection, pp. 19-21.)

Simmons was a very immoral and corrupt man. The movie Gaslight was inspired by his life. He had a mistress and wanted rid of his wife. So, he drugged her and tried to convince her that she was crazy. She got wise to him thought and sued him. The result was a sensational trial. He had to resign from the AMA and was replaced by Lawrence Fishbein, his protege.

Fishbein extended the AMA's influence into the food industry. They tested food to determine if it would get the "seal of approval." Usually it was really determined by money. While the AMA was stating that two tuna companies met its stringent standards, the FDA was seizing the shipments of both companies because "they consisted in whole or in part of decomposed animal substand." (Mullins, Murder by Injection, p. 26.) One of the companies that advertised it's AMA approval was Land O' Lakes butter, which had previously been prosecuted for adulterating its product to keep the fact that it was spoiled from being detected. In the 1940's the AMA stopped giving approval for food, largely because it was narrowly escaping lawsuits. They quickly replaced this with the field of surgery.

Surgery was a barbaric business until the 1880's when antiseptics and anesthesia made it more respectible. A man named William Halsted went to Germany to study medicine. He was a great proponent of German medicine. He pioneered sterile surgery. He also perfected invasive surgery. He is considered the inventor of radical mastectomy.

Due to his methods, surgery became the prefered method of treating cancer. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York was founded by J.Marion Sims. Prior to that he was performing surgery on slave women in the 1840's. They made excellent guinea pigs because they were at the bottom of society. He did his surgery without any anesthesia. He had his friends hold the women down. It was written that his operations were "little short of murderous" and that his friends could only generally only stand to participate in this experimentation one time. Eventually the plantation owners in the area stopped allowing him to experiment on their slave women. Undaunted by this setback, he bought a female slave for $500 and performed 30 operations on her in a short period of time. He was eventually run out of town for his monstrous practices.

He went to New York and founded th Women's Hospital in 1855, as a charity hospital. This gave him a new supply of unfortunate immigrant women to experiment on. He was expelled from the hospital in the 1870's for his treatment of women. He then began to seek out wealthy women for patients. His patients were mostly suffering from vesico-vaginal fistulas. His work with these women got him reinstated at the hospital.

One of the Astor heirs died from Cancer and in their grief, the family gave the Women's Hospital $150,000 to open a cancer treatment center. Having witnessed Sim's methods the trustees were not too keen on the idea. So, Sims had the Astors set him up in a new hospital. Had he lived, he would have been the first director of the New York Cancer Center, which opened in 1884. The hospital changed it's name to Memorial Hospital in the 1890's, and to Sloan-Kettering in the 1950's.(Ralph Moss’ The Cancer Industry, pp. 46-47.) (Mullins, Murder by Injection, pp. 60-62.)

In it's early days the surgeries used to treat cancer were monstrous. One surgery was called the "commando". It removed the whole jaw of the patient and reminded the doctors of the slashig attacks of WWI commandos. The doctors at Memorial Hosptial did proceedures that basically hollowed out the entire body in an attempt to remove all cancer. They also amputated bodies from the waist down to treat pelvic cancer. Many patients chose death.(Moss, The Cancer Industry, pp. 48-49.)

The hospital received another benefactor in James Douglas. He owned the largest copper mine in the world. He also owned radium and uranium deposits. He wanted experiments conducted using radium to treat cancer. He gave the hospital $100,000 for this. The price of radium immediately went up by 1000%. Douglas died in 1913 of radiation poisoning. By the 1920's Memorial Hospital derived most of it's income from radium treatment.

In 1927, the Rockefellers contributed millions to Memorial Hospital, as well as land to build a new hospital on in the 1930's. At the same time, Standard Oil of New Jersey, owned by the Rockefellers began doing business with I.G.Farben. They were the company that developed the Sarin, Tabun and Zyklon B used in the Nazi gas chambers.

Through the Rockefeller's connection to I.G. Farben, Memorial Hospital began chemotherapy prior to WWII. Standard Oil had one of it's executives, Frank Howard on the hospital's research committee. He talked G.M. executives Alfred P. Sloan and Charls Kettering into donating for the purpose of turning Memorial Hospital into a research and treatment center.

Kettering Laboratoris in Cincinnati was responsible for the research that showed that lead, fluoride and aluminum were benign substances. Sloan was connected to the Morgan family, as in J.P. Morgan. The Morgans were also part of the control behind the hospital.

What makes this research done by Kettering relevant is that it paved the way for chemotherapy.Chemicals like arsenic and lead have been used since the time of Paracelsus, but the patient usually died. In the 1930's it was considered barbaric as a treatment and the proponents or radiation were against it for their own reasons. During WWII chemicals like DDT, and nerve gas were used. Napalm was invented and atomic weapons. Chemicals began to be looked upon as a way to better our lives.

Where is this going? Wallstreet runs Memorial Sloan-Kettering, and the hospital controls cancer research in the West. These corporations are not philanthropic. They are out to get a profit. But the ultimate damage they create is not in the fact that they have more money than everyone else, it is in the fact that they destroy lives, and damage the quality of our lives, by messing with our health.

The ultimate goal behind taking over medicine and education is socialism. If you do not believe that socialism is the intent of these founders of the education system, take it from John Dewey's own words.

"All that society has accomplished for itself is put, through the agency of the school, at the disposal of its future members. All its better thoughts of itself it hopes to realize through the new possibilities thus opened to its future self. Here individualism and socialism are at one."

The important thing to know is that it's not going to do anyone a bit of good
to complain about the money, because they knew that they were going to mess it
up back before WWII and they knew that if they didn't occupy our minds in other ways
we would get mad about it; so they set about secretly taking away our civil rights
so that when we did get mad, they would be able to turn those laws that people are
unaware of loose on us to shut people up. If they came out with semi truck loads
of their money and threw it to us, it wouldn't do us a bit of good with no civil rights.

And they were able to take our civil rights away because they took away our ability to
think for ourselves through the public education system. The Socialist Takeover Of The Public School System And The Plan To Teach Us To Conform

One of the worst things they have worked diligently to take from us is our faith in God.


Here is a Timeline of how the Rockefellers changed modern medicine.




1901 – Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research Opens
Based out of New York, this became one of the most “richly endowed” research centers. By 1928, John D. Rockefeller had given it $65 million in endowment funds. This later became Rockefeller University.(Paul Starr, “The Social Transformation of American Medicine.”)



1910 – Flexner Report Published, Establishes New Standards For Medical Education

This highly influential report, sponsored by the Rockefeller’s and Carnegie Foundation, evaluated medical schools and restructured American medical education. It set up a new standard so that schools could only be accredited if they showed an emphasis in drug based research and treatment. Homeopathy and other alternative approaches to medicine were no longer recognized. Abraham Flexner, author of the report, was on the staff of the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. In 1910, 161 medical schools existed. By 1919, there were only 81 left.(http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Health_Concerns/Pharmageddon/drugs_and_big_money.htm)(http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=American_Medical_Association)


1913 – Rockefeller Foundation Establishes the International Health Commission
This laid the foundation for how health and science research and development were to be conducted. Many of today’s health institutions were modeled on this commission’s practices, policies, and research processes such as the UN’s World Health Organization, the U.S. Government’s National Science Foundation, and the National Institute of Health.



1918 – Public Health Becomes Rockefeller Foundation’s Top Priority

“The Foundation identifies public health education as one of its principal areas of interest, and builds and endows the first school of public health at Johns Hopkins University.”



1921 – Rockefeller Foundation Contributes $357 million to Medical Schools Around the World (According to the Rockefeller Foundation, this was $357 million in “current dollars” (http://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/who-we-are/our-history/1920-1929/)

This spreads the drug-based approach to the most prominent schools around the world.



1922 – Dr. Royal Raymond Rife Begins Cancer Research

In the 1920s, Dr. Rife – a brilliant bacteriologist and former student of John Hopkins University – began researching and developing an alternative cancer cure.



1924 – Morris Fishbein Becomes Primary Editor of JAMA

JAMA, the Journal of the American Medical Association, is one of the most influential medical journals in the world. As head of JAMA, Morris Fishbein, became one of most powerful, prominent men in medicine during the time. He transformed the industry into a money-making machine and used negative campaigns to squash competitors. He was one of the key figures to suppress Dr. Royal Rife’s cancer cure.



1924 – Harry Hoxsey Founds First Cancer Clinic in Taylorville, Illinois

Harry Hoxsey offers a natural herbal formula to cure cancer that thousands claim to have worked. This is the first of 17 clinics to eventually open.



1926 – JAMA Publishes First Tirade Against Hoxsey

The article scares doctors and researchers from being associated with Hoxsey.



1927 – John D. Rockefeller Jr. Gave the First of his Annual $60,000 Contribution to Memorial (Sloan-Kettering) Cancer Center



1932 – Dr. Rife Develops Cancer Cure

Dr. Rife developed a machine that could neutralize disease-causing micro-organisms, including cancer cells, with the use of radio frequencies.



1932 - Director of Rockefeller Institute, Dr. Thomas Rivers, Denies Success of Rife Cancer Treatment

In 1932, Dr. Arthur Kendall, director of Medical Research at Northwestern University, spoke before the Association of American Physicians at Johns Hopkins University about the preliminary successes with Rife's methods and treatments of cancer. Dr. Thomas Rivers, virologist and bacteriologist, director of the Rockefeller Institute (a primary source of funding for medical research) and Dr. Hans Zinsser, called Kendall a liar to his face in front of the assembled crowd.(http://educate-yourself.org/cn/rifetimelinemay1998.shtml)

1934 - Rife’s Treatment Cures 16 Terminally Ill Cancer Patients

In 1934 at the Scripps Institute in La Jolla, Southern California, Rife conducted clinical trials on 16 terminally ill cancer patients, and successfully cured all of them. A team of medical specialists – including Dr. Milbank Johnson, Chairman of the Special Medical Research Committee of USC; George Fischer of the NY Children’s Hospital; and Dr. Wayland Morrison, the chief medical officer of the Santa Fe Railway – confirmed the findings.



1938 – The AMA Indicts Rife for Fraudulent Medical Practices



1939 – Philip Hoyland Files Suit Against Royal Rife’s Company, the Beam Ray Corporation

Philip Hoyland admitted to accepting a $10,000 bribe from Hahn Realty Group (AMA Agents) to sue the Beam Ray Corporation.



1939 – New Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Opens – John D. Rockefeller donated the land and provided $3 million of funding



1940s – Rife’s Work Is Destroyed & Continues to be Suppressed



1949 – Hoxsey Sues JAMA and Editors for Libel and Slander – Hoxsey Wins



1949 – Morris Fishbein is Ousted from AMA



1956 – FDA Issues Public Warning About Hoxsey Cancer Treatment



1960 – Hoxsey Method Banned in U.S. by the FDA



1960 – Laurance Rockefeller Serves as Chairman of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York from 1960-1982

This center is one of the most influential cancer centers in the world. During WWII it performed some of the first experiments applying chemical warfare weapons to the “treatment of cancer”, which evolved into chemotherapy.



1963 – Bio-Medical (Hoxsey) Center Opens in Tijuana, Mexico

It continues to operate and claims an 80% success rate.



1971 – President Nixon Declares a “War on Cancer”

Signs $1.6 billion law.



1977 – Sloan-Kettering Rejects Laetrile (derived from Apricot Kernels) as Effective Cancer Treatment

This is despite positive results from Sloan-Kettering’s own famous researcher, Kanematsu Suguira. In November of 1977 Dr. Ralph Moss, Assistant Director of public affairs at Sloan-Kettering, held a press-conference about the success and potential of laetrile, despite the centers desire to cover it up. Ralph Moss was fired the next day for “failing to carry out the most basic job responsibilities.”



1991 – Rockefeller Foundation Helps Start Children’s Vaccine Initiative

The Foundation joins with the United Nations Development Programme, UNICEF, WHO and the World Bank to form the Children’s Vaccine Initiative (CVI). These organizations cause human beings untold harm through enforced immunizations.



2010 – More Than Half a Million Americans Die of Cancer