Showing posts with label Rockefellers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rockefellers. Show all posts

Thursday, August 30, 2012

Does It Matter If You Are Pro-Life Or Pro-Choice?


I have been seeing about an equal amount of posts that are Pro-Choice and Pro-Life on my FaceBook wall. And the Presidential candidates have made it an issue by tying it to the issue of rape. But it really matters not in this country which side you are on, because you don't get to make the decision. There is no such thing as Pro-Choice in this country, and there damn sure isn't a policy of Pro-Life in our government, because it doesn't value life.

Way back in the 1960's the Rockefeller Foundation started working towards the development and implementation of an "Anti-fertility Vaccine." By 1972, the World Health Organization and the UN were working with them, and the program had been given a more politically correct name "Fertility Reduction Vaccine." They had a task force, the Task Force on Immunological Methods for Fertility Regulation. They were studying the large scale manufacture and administration of this type of vaccine at low cost.

"In 1972 the Organization...expanded its programme of research in human reproduction to provide an international focus for an intensified effort to improve existing methods of fertility regulation, to develop new methods and to assist national authorities in devising the best ways of providing them on a continued basis. The programme is closely integrated with other WHO research on the delivery of family planning care by health services, which in turn feeds into WHO's technical assistance programme to governments at the service level."(http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/77164?uid=3739704&uid=2&uid=4&uid=3739256&sid=21101157334641)(http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/77164?uid=3739704&uid=2&uid=4&uid=3739256&sid=21101157334641http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/77164?uid=3739704&uid=2&uid=4&uid=3739256&sid=21101157334641

As you can see from the following report at the NIH, they have decided that since hormonal methods of rendering men infertile don't work too well, they intend to use chemical methods.(http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2490936/pdf/bullwho00079-0002.pdfhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2490936/pdf/bullwho00079-0002.pdf ) This report also shows that the Rockefeller Foundation is funding this research.

Please do not be naive enough to believe that people as rich as the Rockefeller's have any truly altruistic reason for caring how many children you have. They just want to make sure that there are less of us, so there is more for them.

The study at the above link says that the chemical gossypol that they researched caused menstrual disorders in women, so if it caused these problems for women, it would logically follow that just because it caused male infertility, it isn't healthy. In fact it caused neurological problems. So they decided to experiment on Chinese people with it, and decided that if the dose was low enough it wouldn't hurt you and was reversible. Really?

If you read my other posts on eugenics, you will soon learn that organizations like Planned Parenthood are not as benign and helpful as you are led by the nose to believe. They were established by eugenicists prior to WWI and their main purpose is NOT to allow women to have the right to choose whether or not to get pregnant or to have an abortion once she becomes pregnant. Their true purpose is to control and ultimately to stop the birth of whomever they determine to be undesirable.

To point out what may not be obvious, the very fact that they are calling this a vaccine, shows that they are going to be messing with peoples immune systems in order to cause infertility. You might not get pregnant, but at what cost to your health? They don't care if you suffer and die early. So much the better, because there will be one less mouth feeding off the resources they want to hoard.

“Because of the genetic diversity of human populations”, states the document, “immune responses to vaccines often show marked differences from one individual to another in terms of magnitude and duration. These differences may be partly or even completely overcome with appropriately engineered FRVs (Fertility Regulating Vaccines) and by improvements in our understanding of what is required to develop and control the immune response elicited by different vaccines.”

“A new approach to fertility regulation is the development of vaccines directed against human substances required for reproduction. Potential candidates for immunological interference include reproductive hormones, ovum and sperm antigens, and antigens derived from embryonic or fetal tissue.(…). An antifertility vaccine must be capable of safely and effectively inhibiting a human substance, which would need somehow to be rendered antigenic. A fertility-regulating vaccine, moreover, would have to produce and sustain effective immunity in at least 95% of the vaccinated population, a level of protection rarely achieved even with the most successful viral and bacterial vaccines. But while these challenges looked insuperable just a few years ago, recent advances in biotechnology- particularly in the fields of molecular biology, genetic engineering and monoclonal antibody production- are bringing antifertility vaccines into the realm of the feasible.”

I found the fact that they mentioned using fetal and embryonic cells very interesting, because it has recently become public knowledge that they are putting fetal cells in our food.(http://whqlibdoc.who.int/bulletin/1987/Vol65-No6/bulletin_1987_65(6)_779-783.pdfhttp://whqlibdoc.who.int/bulletin/1987/Vol65-No6/bulletin_1987_65(6)_779-783.pdf )(http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/1993/WHO_HRP_WHO_93.1.pdfhttp://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/1993/WHO_HRP_WHO_93.1.pdf )

As a person who suffers from an autoimmune disorder, I can't help but feel very angry and betrayed by my government for allowing this experimentation. They have obviously been experimenting with better vaccine delivery systems and more effective ones for years now so that they can tell us we need all these new vaccines for new and old diseases, and as an added benefit to them, you and your children will be infertile. I fail to see how that is Pro-Choice.

It's something to think about the next time you get into a Pro-Choice argument with someone or the next time you and your family get in line to get your vaccinations.

In addition to the Rockefeller Foundation, the Bill and Malinda Gates Foundation has a BIG hand in population control around the world. One of their latest projects is research and development of nano-particles that could be administered to you without your knowledge to render you infertile by introducing foreign DNA into your body. (http://www.infowars.com/bill-gates-funds-covert-vaccine-nanotechnology/(http://www.infowars.com/bill-gates-funds-covert-vaccine-nanotechnology/http://www.infowars.com/bill-gates-funds-covert-vaccine-nanotechnology/ )

The Gates Foundation has proudly been partnering with other organizations to force people at gunpoint to be vaccinated in Malawi.(http://www.faceofmalawi.com/2011/07/131-children-vaccinated-at-gunpoint-in-malawi/(http://www.faceofmalawi.com/2011/07/131-children-vaccinated-at-gunpoint-in-malawi/)(http://www.gatesfoundation.org/maternalnewbornandchildhealth/Pages/melinda-french-gates-malawi-slideshow.aspxhttp://www.gatesfoundation.org/maternalnewbornandchildhealth/Pages/melinda-french-gates-malawi-slideshow.aspx)

While they pretend to be philanthropic, it is obvious that they are talking out both sides of their mouths, just in the fact that they have 2 opposite agendas: reducing childhood death and population control. The two things are really not compatible because if you want to control population, you don't really value ALL human life. The following excerpt from one of Bill Gates' statements shows that what he is truly after is controlling the consumption of resources and stability, which is a nice way of saying control of the peoples of the world through government.
" then you would have all the tools to reduce childhood death, reduce population growth, and everything -- the stability, the environment -- benefits from that."(http://edition.cnn.com/2011/HEALTH/02/03/gupta.gates.vaccines.world.health/http://edition.cnn.com/2011/HEALTH/02/03/gupta.gates.vaccines.world.health/ )

The Gates Foundation is also sponsoring anti-vaccine surveillance and alert systems. http://jonrappoportmedia.blogspot.com/2012/08/gates-foundation-awards-17-million-to.htmlhttp://jonrappoportmedia.blogspot.com/2012/08/gates-foundation-awards-17-million-to.html
With regard to vaccines in general and the way people are being manipulated, the Council on Foreign Relations actually felt that it would be a good idea to make think people think there was a shortage of the H1N1 vaccine so that people who were resistant to getting it would get it because they were afraid they might not be able to change their minds later, and because if everyone else was rushing to get it, it must be a good idea.(http://www.cfr.org/health-and-disease/session-council-foreign-relations-symposium-pandemic-influenza-science-economics-foreign-policy/p20442(http://www.cfr.org/health-and-disease/session-council-foreign-relations-symposium-pandemic-influenza-science-economics-foreign-policy/p20442 )

“I think what would work better would be to say that there was a shortage and people tend to buy more of something that’s in demand. (Laughter.) We saw that — there was one season where, really, people lined up all night to get a flu shot.” Simonsen says, much to the amusement of the other attendees at the symposium."

In an article at infowars.com, a very valid point was made in reference to a statement made by Andrew Jack about the people who were hesitant to take the vaccine.

"“I’m not sure that we’re countering these people very well.” Jack concludes before suggesting that the CFR put out soundbites about there being more mercury in a Tuna sandwich than in the H1N1 vaccine in order to convince “the crazy people” that it is safe.

The fact is however, you do not directly inject a tuna sandwich into your bloodstream. Is it more likely that a two fold increase in autism over the last six years is directly related to thimerosal in vaccines or to tuna sandwiches?"(http://www.infowars.com/cfr-recording-suggests-creating-false-scarcity-to-drive-up-demand-for-h1n1-vaccine/(http://www.infowars.com/cfr-recording-suggests-creating-false-scarcity-to-drive-up-demand-for-h1n1-vaccine/ )


In my other posts on eugenics, I have shown that there are people in this country, in the UN and around the world who believe that if you are not of the elite, you shouldn't be having children. And one of President Obama's own advisers believes that if you happen to be Pro-Life, or just choose to have your baby and you are unmarried, that it automatically makes you an unfit mother, and your child should be taken away from you and put into foster care. That's almost funny when you are familiar with the circumstances of Barach Obama's childhood. But wait, he's a wealthy, successful, politician, so it's different.

What it all boils down to is this: You do not have the final say-so on your fertility, unless you happen to be one of the power elite in this country.


Wednesday, June 27, 2012

The History and Practice of Eugenics, PT 9


The Codex Alimentarius


The altruistic purpose of this commission is in "protecting health of the consumers and ensuring fair trade practices in the food trade, and promoting coordination of all food standards work undertaken by international governmental and non-governmental organizations".

It is run jointly by the Food and Agricultural Organization and the World Health Organization. What actually happens through them is that corporations make more money off of food and control us through food. Obviously, if you control the food, you control the people. The Us is the chair of Codex.

The Codex organization is working toward regulating everything we eat and drink including water. They will implement their regulations in every country that belongs to the World Trade Organization. If these countries do not follow them, then they will face trade sanctions.

Regulations as of December 2009:

* All nutrients (vitamins and minerals) are to be considered toxins/poisons and are to be removed from all food because Codex prohibits the use of nutrients to "prevent, treat or cure any condition or disease"

* All food (including organic) is to be irradiated, removing all toxic nutrients from food (unless eaten locally and raw).

* Nutrients allowed will be limited to a Positive List developed by Codex which will include such beneficial nutrients like Fluoride (3.8 mg daily) developed from environmental waste. All other nutrients will be prohibited nationally and internationally to all Codex-compliant countries .

* All nutrients (e.g., CoQ10, Vitamins A, B, C, D, Zinc and Magnesium) that have any positive health impact on the body will be deemed illegal under Codex and are to be reduced to amounts negligible to humans' health .

* You will not even be able to obtain these anywhere in the world even with a prescription.

* All advice on nutrition (including written online or journal articles or oral advice to a friend, family member or anyone) will be illegal. This includes naturalnews.com reports on vitamins and minerals and all nutritionist's consultations.

* All dairy cows are to be treated with Monsanto's recombinant bovine growth hormone.

* All animals used for food are to be treated with potent antibiotics and exogenous growth hormones.

* The reintroduction of deadly and carcinogenic organic pesticides that in 1991, 176 countries (including the U.S.) have banned worldwide including 7 of the 12 worst at the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pesticides (e.g., Hexachlorobenzene, Toxaphene, and Aldrin) will be allowed back into food at elevated levels .

* Dangerous and toxic levels (0.5 ppb) of aflotoxin in milk produced from moldy storage conditions of animal feed will be allowed. Aflotoxin is the second most potent (non-radiation) carcinogenic compound known to man.

* Mandatory use of growth hormones and antibiotics on all food herds, fish and flocks

* Worldwide implementation of unlabeled GMOs into crops, animals, fish and trees.

* Elevated levels of residue from pesticides and insecticides that are toxic to humans and animals.

Some examples of potential permissible safe levels of nutrients under Codex include :

* Niacin - upper limits of 34 mcg daily (effective daily doses include 2000 to 3000 mcgs).

* Vitamin C - upper limits of 65 to 225 mcg daily (effective daily doses include 6000 to 10000 mcgs).

* Vitamin D - upper limits of 5 μg daily (effective daily doses include 6000 to 10000 μg).

* Vitamin E - upper limits of 15 IU of alpha tocopherol only per day, even though alpha tocopherol by itself has been implicated in cell damage and is toxic to the body (effective daily doses of mixed tocopherols include 10000 to 12000 IU).

In 1995, the Food and Drug Administration changed their policy and it stated that international standards, i.e. Codex, would supercede US laws, if US laws were incomplete. This is essentially illegal to make some other governing body superior to US law. But in 2004, the US passed the Central American Free Trade Agreement, which required US regulations to meet Codex standards by 2009.

Effectively, we cannot get rid of these regulations as long as we belong to the WTO. It is believed that the purpose of this, is to control population, through food, with the aid of Big Pharma and the US government. The FAO and WHO estimate that the vitamin regulation will reduce popularized by 3 million.

The more natural things we eat for health or take for health, the more we cut into Big Pharma's profits.

IF proper science were being used, biochemistry would be used to assess nutrients. Instead, Codex uses Risk Assessment, which is a branch of toxicology. Because they want us to view nutrients as toxins.

The Codex Alimentarius Vitamin and Mineral Guideline, can ban high potency vitamins, by setting standards for dosages or supplements added to food extremely low.

The DSHEA, Dietary Supplement Health Education Act of 1994 classifed supplements as food. But Codex supercedes that and calls supplements a drug or toxins, by referring to levels of them as dosages.
So Codex violates a US law with an international law.
I looked around to see what kind of news stories I could find on Codex. I found one that says Argentina joined the International Olive Oil Commission in order to prove that their olive oil was authentic, even though it is different that the oils from Mediterranean countries. The information was found in Codex documents. Things like that are important because the prices of olive oil are down right now.http://www.oliveoiltimes.com/olive-oil-business/olive-oil-prices-lowest-since-2009/27024

Despite the fact that Codex has regulations about putting things like GMO's on the market without testing them, that is exactly what happened in the US. And Codex has done nothing about it. So obviously, they are not really out for our best interests, and someone else is calling the shots, like maybe Monsanto. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dave-murphy/dan-quayle-and-michael-ta_b_1551732.html

Greenpeace did a study on the vegetables in our grocery stores and found levels of toxins and chemicals at seven times what Codex allows. Yet where is Codex when they could be useful?http://asiancorrespondent.com/82758/contaminated-veggies-switch-organic-produce/

I looked around for some of the more recent videos on Codex alimentarius, so I could post them here.

In 2009, in the mother of all conflicts of interest, Obama appointed Michael Taylor as a senior advisor for the FDA. He had previously served as vice president at Monsanto. Among other things that they do, Monsanto in a leader in GMO, genetically modified foods. He was also the food Czar at the FDA when GMO's were first allowed onto the market, without any testing at all to determine their safety.

Monsanto markets genetically modified corn that is insect resistant. In Europe, six countries from the EU refuse to allow it to be grown in their countries. The EU has been highly resistant towards any GMO's. Corn or corn products are in everything. The Monsanto corn has pesticide in the seeds, and now there are indications that bugs are becoming resistant to the pesticides, so why keep them in there if they don't work or are starting to fail? It is estimated that before they started making this modified corn, it cost farmers about $1 million a year in damaged crops and pesticide costs.

Monsanto's corn is engineered to produce the Cry3Bb1 protein from Bacillus thuringiensis, or Bt, a natural insecticide. There is also SmartStax corn that has an additional chemical from Dow Chemical and Dupont. SmartStax corn has eight different genetically modified traits in it. Prior to it's development, the most any other product had was three. The corn produces six insecticide toxins and is tolerant to 2 herbicides.

Monsanto also makes seeds for corn, soybeans and cotton, that have Round Up in them. But weeds are becoming resistant to that also.http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-06-15/monsanto-corn-injured-by-early-rootworm-feeding-in-illinois

One of their newer products is GMO drought resistant corn. They developed it in partnership with BASF. It was approved earlier this year. The USDA said, "corn and progeny derived from it are unlikely to pose plant pest risks and is no longer to be considered regulated article under APHIS’ Biotechnology Regulations." and "would have no significant impacts, individually or collectively, on the quality of the human environment and will have no effect on federally listed threatened or endangered species, species proposed for listing, or their designated or proposed critical habitats."

The Cornucopia Institute reported that the USDA received almost 45,000 public comments opposed to MON 87460, with only 23 comments in favor. Apparently, this had little or no impact on Obama or Secretary of Agriculture Vilsack.

Now they are wanting to sell corn that is resistant to 2, 4-D, which was the primary ingredient in Agent Orange. If that doesn't sit well with you, the USDA is taking public comments on it, but whether or not your comment will matter is unlikely, given that they didn't listen to people opposed to MON 87460.

When I was growing up, my Grandmother told me how they had a cow that was solely to provide my Dad milk. This would be unpasteurized and unprocessed milk. But the FDA is conducting armed raids on farmers who produce and sell unpasteurized milk. Michael Taylor is responsible for these raids.http://www.change.org/petitions/president-obama-dump-former-monsanto-lobbyist-as-fda-food-safety-czarhttp://www.change.org/petitions/president-obama-dump-former-monsanto-lobbyist-as-fda-food-safety-czar

Taylor's job at the FDA has been on again off again, because part of the time he works for companies like Monsanto. In1994, he wrote the labeling guidelines for dairy products that have the hormone rBGH in them. So that these products wouldn't be stigmatized, he forced companies that make products without rBGH state on their labels that rGBH wasn't any different than the naturally occurring hormone, so people would think that their product wasn't any better because it didn't contain it.

Before he was able to do this, as a lawyer for Monsanto, he advised them on whether or not it would be legal for states to institute such labeling regulations, and whether or not Monsanto would be able to sue
other companies for telling people that their products were rGBH free. So while in the private sector, he worked out the legalities, and through his public position he worked out the logistics and implemented the program.

Taylor is not the only person who goes in and out the revolving doors between Monsanto, the FDA, and the EPAhttp://www.rense.com/general33/fd.htmhttp://www.rense.com/general33/fd.htm

Both of my children had trouble tolerating infant formula, so they had to be switched to soy formula. Now soybeans are GMO's and soy allergies went up by 50% when GMO soy products were introduced to the UK. So, if your child is lactose intolerant, or allergic to dairy, and they are allergic to soy, what are you to do, especially if breast feeding wasn't an option. In my case I was on massive doses of antibiotics for a year after my son was born, and the medicine would have passed into breast milk.

One of the types of genetic modifications in food, is antibiotics. We hear all sorts of statements that germs are antibiotic resistant due to doctors over prescribing antibiotics. But is more likely, that the antibiotics in our food cause it. For one thing if those genes transfer to bacteria in your digestive tract, then it would modify the bacteria and make it resistant. Now with the idea that gene transfer is possible, what happens if GMO pesticides in corn transfer within our digestive tract, we would be turning the bacteria inside us into pesticide factories. No tests have been done to see if these GMO genes do transfer, but it is scientifically possible. The American Academy of Environment Sciences doesn't think GMO's are safe. “Several animal studies indicate serious health risks associated with GM food,” including infertility, immune problems, accelerated aging, faulty insulin regulation, and changes in major organs and the gastrointestinal system. The AAEM asked physicians to advise patients to avoid GM foods."

It sounds to me like a good way to lower the population, to make people infertile, vulnerable to disease because of damaged immune systems, increase their risk of diabetes, cause organ damage, and cause them to die early.

At least sugar, fat and salt in food makes it taste better, the GMO's usually don't unless you count the new ones that are specifically made for that out of fetal cells. If someone handed you two boxes, one that contained an all natural herbicide and one that contained an all natural pesticide, would you eat them?

Here's a link to a current news story about people signing petitions to get rid of Michael Taylor. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/blogpost/post/monsanto-petition-tells-obama-cease-fda-ties-to-monsanto/2012/01/30/gIQAA9dZcQ_blog.html

Here's the petition if you would like to sign ithttp://signon.org/sign/tell-obama-to-cease-fda

One of the most telling things I found out about Monsanto GMO's was that they had been busted on the fact that they don't serve them to their employees in their cafeterias. Bill Gates follows the same practice. And so do the Rockefellershttp://templestream.xanga.com/759470927/gates-and-rockefeller-cafeterias-reject-monsanto-ge-foods/

This brings us around to David Rockefeller, and good old Bill and Melinda Gates again. In February 2012, he was at a press conference hyping up his digital revolution of the food supply in Rome. The reporters asked him about GMO's and he replied,"You should go out and talk to people growing rice and say do they mind that it was created in a laboratory when their child has enough to eat?” I suppose right at the moment they were filling their children's bellies, they might not mind, but if you gave them a choice between GMO's and organic food, they wouldn't opt for the GMO's. Their cafeterias are organic too.

AGRA or the Alliance for A Green Revolution in Africa, is jointly funded by the Rockefeller and Bill and Melinda Gates Foundations. Thanks to them, cassava, which is a staple food in Africa, is now GMO cassava. Monsanto also introduced GMO corn into Africa through the WEMA or Water Efficient Maize for Africa program. The Bill Gates Foundation and Warren Buffet both supported it. Rockefeller University's website says it only serves rGBH free milk, cage free eggs and organic food. The Gates Foundation owns stock in Monsantohttp://templestream.xanga.com/759470927/gates-and-rockefeller-cafeterias-reject-monsanto-ge-foods/

They are all members of the so called Doomsday Seed Vault in the Arctic. This is a stash of unmodified seeds, ostensibly just in case of some environment catastrophe. But the reality is that they don't want seeds to be sold or grown that they don't have the patents on. http://www.globalresearch.ca/PrintArticle.php?articleId=10300

In India, it is being reported that there is an epidemic of suicide among farmers. These farmers are told that they will become rich if they switch to growing GMO crops. But when droughts and other things cause their crops to fail, they are deeply in dept because they have to borrow money to buy these seeds from Monsanto. Their government has encouraged these farmers to opt into GMO crops, because in return for doing so, India received International Money Fund loans back in the eighties and nineties. These loans helped the economy of the cities at the expense of lives.

They were told that they wouldn't have to use pesticides, but instead, their cotton crops were ravaged by boll worms. They were not told that these crops require more water, and then they were hit with droughts.

All through history, farmers have saved seeds to replant next year, but with GMO seeds, they don't produce seeds that can be planted. So, the farmers have to buy new seeds every year. As a result of the plight of these poor Indian farmers, Prince Charles is setting up the Bhumi Vardaan Foundation. It will promote organic crops.http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1082559/The-GM-genocide-Thousands-Indian-farmers-committing-suicide-using-genetically-modified-crops.html

In the US, Monsanto even made sure that farmers who tried to grow crops that would allow them to save seeds for the next year would be penalized for doing so. In 2011, they won a court case that was begun back in 2007 against an Indiana farmer named, Vernon Bowman. They said he infringed on their patent by saving seeds that had some of the Monsanto seeds mixed in with them for replanting. Bowman said he bought the seeds in part of some mixed commodity seeds. Commodity seeds are not required to differentiate between GMO and non GMO seeds.

The court ruled that Monsanto's agreement with farmers prohibits them from selling the progeny of Round Up Ready seeds, that it didn't prohibit the sale of second generation seeds. But farmers are not allowed to plant those same seeds in the ground in order to grow more seeds to sell. http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/09/21/us-monsanto-lawsuit-idUSTRE78K79O20110921

Monsanto has been tracking down farmers all over the Midwest and suing them for saving seeds. They have a toll free hotline where people can make anonymous tips about farmers who are cleaning and saving seeds. The farmers have to sign a contract that says they won't do that, but instead buy new seeds every year from Monsanto. These contracts say how much GMO Round Up Ready acres they plant. Monsanto also runs television and radio adds to encourage people to turn in their neighbors. When they get a tip, they send out detectives to go through the farmers records and over their farms looking for evidence. They look to see how much seed they bought and how much they sold. Monsanto sues the farmers that if feels it can prove have saved seeds. They say the money they will goes to American Farm Bureau for scholarships.

Monsanto says that they are just trying to protect the millions of dollars that they have invested in the research and development of their products. But the National Family Farm Coalition filed a suit, that claims that they are just trying to monopolize the sale of seeds, and that they fix prices so that they can create and maintain this monopoly.

Some of the court cases have claimed that after the second generation of seeds, the patent exhausts itself. Others have claimed that Monsanto cannot patent plants, which self replicate in the first place; saying that patent law was established for machines and things that someone invented.

In 1970, Congress enacted the Plant Variety Protection Act. Under that act, farmers could save seeds. But a Supreme Court case said that companies like Monsanto could patent GMO'shttp://www.organicconsumers.org/Monsanto/farmerssued.cfm

Monsanto is following the lead of Big Pharma with regard to patents. It's patent on the Round Up Ready soy beans is due to run out in 2014. Under normal circumstances, that would allow competition from other companies. But rather than allow that to happen, they have already come up with Round Up Ready 2 and are forcing it on the market, so that the Round Up Ready 1 seed will be obsolete, and they will maintain their monopoly. This is the tactic that pharmaceutical companies use. They will modify an existing medicine slightly, give it a new name and extend their time before the patent runs out. This makes the consumer have to wait years before there is an affordable generic available.

Farmers would like to be able to start saving their seeds when the patent runs out, but it will be difficult to find seeds that only contain Round Up Ready 1, so that they won't violate the patent. Cross pollination is a very real possibility, because even Monsanto can't control the wind, or contamination that occurs via animals. In a bit of false magnanimity, Monsanto says it won't try to keep farmers from saving seed. But they know how hard it will be to find only Round Up Ready 1 seeds, which is why, Monsanto is trying to get the new Round Up Ready on the market now. They also didn't start saying that until the Justice Department started investigating them for antitrust law violation. It has been reported that they were not going to re-license companies to use the RoundUp Ready 1 gene, which will force them to buy the Round Up Ready 2 gene. But with the Justice Department looking at them, they backed down on that, but only in the U.S.

There are farmers who need to be able to establish that their crops are organic, because they sell to companies like Whole Food Market. And they are suing Monsanto, because their GMO's are contaminating their crops, and they say, that Monsanto can then claim their crops are GMO's. So, far they have been unsuccessful, because they have been unable to prove in court that Monsanto threatened them. But if they had gone about it, just by saying that Monsanto had contaminated their crops they might have won. Either way, it is highly doubtful that Monsanto ever intended for their product not to cross pollinate with non GMO fields. And that is significant when you realize that it is not just soy beans, but corn and cotton that they are monopolizing.

Other countries require GMO patents to be renewed periodically, and Monsanto intends to maintain those licenses until 2017. American farmers would not be allowed to sell seeds to those countries, which would probably cause them not to want to grow crops that they can't export.

In 2005, the Brazilian government made GMO soybeans legal. But they did this because it was shown that about 75% of the crops were grown from Round Up Ready seeds, made by Monsanto. Round Up ready crops have been modified so that it can be sprayed on them without hurting the plants.

Since the crops were now legal, Monsanto started charging the farmers 2% of the sales of the soy beans. The amount of farmers growing these GMO soybeans was now up to 85%. And they test all of the crops to make sure who is growing them. If the farmer claims that his crops are not the Round Up Ready soy beans, and they prove that they are, he has to pay 3% of his profits.

Monsanto says that the farmers are getting the Round Up Ready seeds illegally. The Brazilian Association of Seeds and Seedlings, says they are not. In April, the Brazilian courts said that they were charging this 2-3 percent illegally, and ordered them to pay it back. Right now, it is in appealhttp://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/18/monsanto-brazil-soybean-farmers_n_1606267.html

Monsanto does not want us using bio-fuels like hemp and sugarcane. Hemp doesn't require insecticides, or phosphate fertilizer. So that would cut down on their profits. Instead, they prefer that we grow their corn, which requires their pesticide.

Whether or not you believe in legalized marijuana/hemp. The reason it is not already legal, may not have anything to do with drug usage. It is estimated that 1 acre of hemp could yield more paper than 2-4 acres of trees. Even though we are living in the digital age, we still need paper, and the demand for it will continue to grow. If we don't find another source for it, we will have massive deforestation. This in turn will have environment results, which ultimately will cause declines in population.

Even cars can and have been made from hemp based plastic. Ford made one in 1941. This hemp plastic is supposed to be 10 times stronger than steel. Only half of the oil we import is for fuel. The other half is for plastic manufacturing. It is ironic that organizations like PETA want us to use pleather, without realizing that by using something that is a petroleum product, we injure far more animals than those who might lose their fur on a farm. And what about the children who starve or get cancer. But save the animals?

Viscoloid Corporation was established in 1900 to make celluloid which was basically plastic. About 25 years later Dupont bought it. Another company that made celluloid was Fiberloid, which was bought out by Monsanto. I.F. Farben's Hoechst-Celanese, also makes plastic. And everyone know that plastic is related to petroleum and therefore the Rockefellers. Round Up is made with Rockefeller fossil fuels, as evidenced by it's chemical name, glyphosate.

I am not sure if I mentioned this before, but Supreme Court Justice, Clarence Thomas used to be a lawyer for Monsanto in the 1970's. He wrote the majority opinion that Monsanto's GMO's were patentable under U.S. patent law.

Recombinant Bovine Growth Hormone or rBGH is the Monsanto growth hormone that causes cows to produce more milk. It was approved by the FDA in 1993. The EU, and Canada, as well as other countries have banned it's use. The American Cancer Society says that it is not the rGBH that we should be concerned with but IGF-1, insulin-like growth factor, which is linked to all sorts of cancer. They say it is also in soy milk. This brings up an interesting point, is IGF-1 in Monsantos soy products? It would seem so. IGF-1 is not destroyed by pasteurization.

The FDA prohibits dairies from claiming that milk with rGBH is different than any other milk. Because rGBH injected cows get more mastitis, they have to be given antibiotics. Monsanto was accused of trying to bribe scientists in order to get rBGH milk approved in Canada. http://www.ethicalinvesting.com/monsanto/news/10009.htm Kroger and Walmart have chosen not to sell store brands of milk with rGBH in it.





The History and Practice of Eugenics, PT. 4

The History and Practice of Eugenics


The Kaiser Wilhelm Institute of Anthropology and Human Heredity was given grants from the Rockefeller Foundation in the 1930's. Eugen Fischer was the leading scientist there at the time. The Nazis empowered him to sterilize 400 children of mixed racial background. And the programs there branched out under the Nazis to killing people who they considered inferior and undesirable, like the mentally ill or physically handicapped. And from there to the Jewish Genocide. So, the Rockefeller Foundation is directly responsible for the Holocaust.

Adolf Hitler had this to say in Mein Kampf, "The Jews were responsible for bringing Negroes into the Rhineland...it suits the purpose of the cool calculating Jew who would use this means of introducing a process of bastardization in the very centre of the European Continent and, by infecting the white race with the blood of an inferior stock, would destroy the foundations of its independent existence."

Again, if black genetics are inferior, how do they take over superior white genes? It contradicts survival of the fittest. It would be in effect, de-evolution.

Eugen Fischer wrote that blacks should only be allowed to survive as long as they were useful to whites.

In May of 1935, the Hamburg Eugenics Court ruled that it was illegal for Aryan women to get abortions, but for non-Aryans it was legal. This was to promote racial hygiene and help the health of the German people.

Not long after the war, in an effort to distance themselves from the Germans, and cover up their plans from the public, they changed the name of Eugenics Quarterly Magazine to Social Biology. The American Birth Control League changed it's name also to Planned Parenthood.


The History and Practice of Eugenics, PT. 3

The History and Practice of Eugenics


In the early 1900's, it became the norm to recommend that mental patients and mentally handicapped people should be institutionalized away from the rest of society. Prior to this era, only criminally insane people had to be locked up, someone who was dangerous to themselves or others.

Some of the things eugenicists pointed to as a basis for their beliefs such as physical superiority to poor people failed to take into account that this was because they ate better diets and other environmental factors rather than genetic factors.

I had never thought of H.G. Wells fiction writing as being in support of eugenics, but other things he wrote certainly did. In 1903 he wrote, "the conclusion is that if we could prevent or discourage the inferior sort of people from having children, and if we could stimulate and encourage the superior sort to increase and multiply, we should raise the general standard of the race."

The modern practice of genetic profiling for couples planning to have children is not a new one. Dr. Caleb Williams Saleeby, believed that couples should have "health books" to prove that their family line did not have any congenital deformities. He was a writer and journalist, who helped start the Eugenics Education Society. He believed that mankind was the perfection of evolution and that white men were superior to all other races of men. And he based this on craniometry. Paul Broca and Samuel Morton were two of the men who studied human skulls, for form , structure and brain capacity, as a method for determining race. Morton believed that blacks have smaller brains than whites do. (http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/141810/craniometryhttp://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/141810/craniometry)

I have read things and seen things on television that point out that there were many people in England and the United States who agreed on a great many things with the Nazi's. Winston Churchill evidentally agreed with them in racial cleansing, because he was a eugenicist. He wrote to Prime Minister Asquith, "I am convinced that the multiplication of the Feeble-Minded, which is proceeding now at an artificial rate, unchecked by any of the old restraints of nature, and actually fostered by civilised conditions, is a terrible danger to the race."(Churchill's Empire: The World That Made Him and the World He Made - Richard Toye - 2010)

Eugenics became popular in the United States at about the same time as it did in Britain. In the United States, it always had racial motives. Whereas in Britain, the upper class had a surplus of factory workers, Americans had surplus people in the form of freed slaves. Then you also have to factor in that at the time it really became full blown, in the early 1900's, immigration was becoming a problem, so new groups of people were added to the list of unfit.

Biologists, Charles B. Davenport and Harry H. Laughlin, were members of the American Breeders Association. They founded The Eugenics Record Office with money from the Carnegie Institute in the early 1900's(I have read various dates from 1904-1910) at Cold Spring Harbor, New York.

"New blood will make the American population darker in pigmentation, smaller in stature, more mercurial . . . more given to crimes of larceny, kidnapping, assault, murder, rape, and sex-immorality."
(In the Name of Eugenics: Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity - Page 47,Daniel J. Kevles - 1985; Barbarian Virtues: The United States Encounters Foreign Peoples at Home and Abroad - Page 159, Matthew Frye Jacobson - 2001)

"The problem of the socially fit must be treated not as one of color, but as a problem of the spread of feeble-mindedness."(Dr. Charles Davenport,1913)

Despite having said this, he believed that feeble-mindedness was spread by people of color.

In their research they used human pedigrees, hereditary questionnairesand interviews of certain groups of special interest to them. (http://library.cshl.edu/special-collections/eugenicshttp://library.cshl.edu/special-collections/eugenics). They had people take these questionnaires door to door. They recorded the characteristics of families on index cards. They had 750,000 of them by 1924. They also used data collected from the census. They believed that their data gave them sound reasons to restrict immigration and marriage, to segregate the races and to forcibly sterilize criminals and anyone they considered to be undesirable. Harry Laughlin began testifying before Congress on their findings with regard to immigration and sterilization, by the early 1920's. By the second decade of the 20th century, 12 states had laws mandating forced sterilization based on the opinions and policies of the Eugenics Record Office. By 1924, 3000 people were sterilized. You can find a pretty comprehensive list of the books written by Davenport and Laughlin, as well as their colleagues here: http://library.cshl.edu/special-collections/eugenicshttp://library.cshl.edu/special-collections/eugenics (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) It's interesting that one of the books in entitled, The Hereditary Factor in Pellagra Pellagra is a disease caused by a niacin deficiency and is not hereditary. It became a problem when corn and corn products became staples of our diets.

Although the page found at the above link says they started the ERO with money from a "local resident," and does not name the Carnegie Foundation, down toward the bottom of the page, is a list of Carnegie Institution files, that pretty well lays out their connection to eugenics. In includes, correspondence from the American Eugenics Society, American Philosophical Society,
Eugenics Advisory Committee, Eugenics Record Office-Financial Statement, Eugenics Research Association, Genetics Record Office, Dept. of Genetics-Biological Laboratory-Plans for Unified Operation.

Some of the people associated with Davenport and the ERO were people like John Harvey Kellogg and the Harrimans, who were railroad magnates.
The Harriman railroad fortune paid local charities, like the New York Bureau of Industries and Immigration to find Jewish, Italian and other immigrants in New York and other places and confine, deport and sterilize them. Mrs. E.H. Harriman(Mary) helped fund the ERO.
(http://hnn.us/articles/1796.htmlhttp://hnn.us/articles/1796.html)(The Fraud of the Fraud: Have You Been Taken for a Ride? - Page 132
Jose M. Paulino - 2008

John Harvey Kellogg, doctor, co-developer of Corn Flakes, founded the Race Betterment Foundation with Charles Davenport and Irving Fisher. You can find some information on the things done in Michigan as a result.(http://www.uvm.edu/~lkaelber/eugenics/MI/MI.htmlhttp://www.uvm.edu/~lkaelber/eugenics/MI/MI.html)(http://www.indiana.edu/~engs/ebook/samples.htmlhttp://www.indiana.edu/~engs/ebook/samples.html)

The Carnegie Foundation, had a man named Frederick Osborn, as a trustee. He wrote, A Preface to Eugenics, in 1940. He obtained grants in 1941, from the foundation for Wake University's genetics program. Dr. William Allan and Dr. C. Nash Herndon who headed the department, believed as did Osborn, that doctors trained in genetics could further the aims of eugenics without the sort of taint that went with the Nazi race purification.

Nevertheless, they still assisted some of the counties in North Carolina to carry out state sponsored sterilization programs. Andrew Carnegie believed that most charitable giving by the upper class had been "indiscriminate charity...spent as to encourage the slothful, the drunken, the unworthy," and the rich needed to address the underlying causes of those conditions, so that their charity would be a better investment. Or in the words of John D. Rockefeller, they needed to be, “a search for cause, an attempt to cure evils at their source."

The Carnegie Institution of Washington also funded Charles Davenport and the ERO. Davenport said, “tens of millions have been given to bolster up the weak and alleviate the suffering of the sick,” while “no important means have been provided to enable us to learn how the stream of weak and susceptible protoplasm may be checked.”

The Indiana Compulsory Sterilization Law, is often pointed at as being the blue print for the laws of other states, it was not the first state law based on eugenics. In 1896, Connecticut passed laws that marriage laws that were exclusionary. The 1905 law in Indiana was pretty typical, in that it forbade marriage for mentally deficient people, those who had transmittable diseases, and habitual drunks. At face value, it would appear that it was because mentally deficient people and drunks would not have the capacity to make a contract, which marriage is, and the disease part would be to stop people from entering into a contract without full disclosure of the facts. But parties had to present a certificate of medical soundness before they could get married. The medical examination was probably designed to screen out people. By 1907, they enacted the compulsory sterilization act. Then other states took up the movement. By 1917, sixteen states had sterilization laws, for criminals, rapists, epileptics and idiots.

This is how the law read:
CHAPTER 215.
AN ACT entitled an act to prevent procreation of confirmed criminals, idiots, imbeciles and rapists; providing that superintendents and boards of managers of institutions where such persons are confined shall have the authority and are empowered to appoint a committee of experts, consisting of two (2) physicians, to examine into the mental condition of such inmates.
[H. 364. Approved March 9, 1907.]
Preamble.
Whereas, Heredity plays a most important part in the trans-
mission of crime, idiocy and imbecility;

Penal Institutions—Surgical Operations.
Therefore, Be it enacted by the general assembly of the State of Indiana, That on and after the passage of this act it shall be compulsory for each and every institution in the state, entrusted with the care of confirmed criminals, idiots, rapists and imbeciles, to appoint upon its staff, in addition to the regular institutional physician, two (2) skilled surgeons of recognized ability, whose duty it shall be, in conjunction with the chief physician of the institution, to examine the mental and physical condition of such inmates as are recommended by the institutional physician and board of managers. If, in the judgment of this committee of experts and the board of managers, procreation is inadvisable and there is no probability of improvement of the mental condition of the inmate, it shall be lawful for the surgeons to perform such operation for the prevention of procreation as shall be decided safest and most effective. But this operation shall not be performed except in cases that have been pronounced unimprovable: Provided, That in no case shall the consultation fee be more than three ($3.00) dollars to each expert, to be paid out of the funds appropriated for the maintenance of such institution.
(Acts 1907, Laws of the State of Indiana, Passed at the Sixty-Fifth Regular Session of the General Assembly, Indianapolis: William B. Burford, Publisher (1907) pp. 377-378)


"The laws of nature require the obliteration of the unfit and human life is valuable only when it is of use to the community or race."(Madison Grant, 1916, Co-Founder of the American Eugenics Society)

Madison Grant was also a member of the New York Zoological Society. In 1906, he authorized an exhibit at the Bronx Zoo, where a 22 year old black man named Oda Benga, was in a cage with an orangutan. When he met with some protest, he replied that it was clearly meant to be a demonstration of Darwin's Theory. Those who supported Darwin's Theory agreed with him. Oda Benga committed suicide ten years later.

Adolf Hitler referred to Madison Grant's book, The Passing of the Great Race, as his bible.

"The black man has never been a competitor but has always been subservient to the white race. And just so long as he remains subservient his position is secure, and just so soon as he becomes a competitor his fate is sealed." (Dr. Benjamin Hays, 1905)


Carrie Buck was a seventeen year old girl who was the first to be sterilized under the Eugenics law passed in Virginia. She was chosen from the Virginia Colony for the Epileptic and Feeble Minded. Her mother was feeble minded and a resident of the colony. Carrie was raped and gave birth to a supposedly, feeble minded child. They believed that she carried the genetic traits for feeble mindedness, and being sexually promiscuous. Her teacher said that she sent notes to school boys which were flirtatious in nature. Harry H. Laughlin, who had never met her sent by mail, a disposition saying that she was a good candidate for sterilization. On October 19, 1927, she was sterilized. Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes said, in reference to Buck v. Bell, "It is better for all of the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind. Three generations of imbeciles are enough." The decision had been 8 to 1 in favor of her being sterilized. The one judge who was against it was Catholic. The child that Carrie bore named Vivian, despite being deemed feeble minded, earned B's on her first grade report card. Due to Buck v. Bell, 8,000 Virginians were sterilized. At one time or another 33 states have enacted laws that caused 60,000 people to undergo sterilization. Buck v. Bell has never been overturned. This sterilization continued until the 1980's.

In 1924, The Immigration Act restricted who could immigrate to America. President Calvin Coolidge said, "America must be kept American. Biological laws show . . . that Nordics deteriorate when mixed with other races." (Survival of the Fittest, Jonathan Kellerman - 2002)

Most people believe that the idea of eugenics came from Nazi Germany; not so, they only became more efficient at ridding their society of undesirable people. Sweden began instituting eugenics about the same time as Germany did, and their laws were on the books until the 1970's. The Danish had eugenics laws before Germany did, and theirs stayed on the books until 1967. Finland also had eugenics laws, as did Norway and Switzerland. Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf, about how he thought that the U. S. policy of restricting immigration based on race was a good policy. Gerhard Wagner, who was the head of the National Socialists Physicians League, stated that America's eugenics policies should be used as a model for Germany.

Hitler's personal physician was Karl Brandt. He was responsible for the killing of crippled children. Viktor Brack, who was part of Hitler's Personal Chancellery, was responsible for Aktion T-4, which was the program that trained doctors in the methods of genocide, then he assigned them to work in the gas chambers exterminating Jews. Both Brandt and Brack were convicted of war crimes and crimes against humanity and executed June 2, 1948. But there were others involved who were not punished.

Dr. Gerhard Wagner said at a Nazi rally in Nuremberg, September 8-14, 1936, " The millions and billions that we have spent...for care of the genetically ill, is a squandering of our national resources that we National Socialists cannot justify when we consider the needs of the healthy population." And there are those that are professing like ideals now. Both the German, Society for Race Hygiene, and the US Eugenics Record office operated under Francis Galton. The Eugenics Congress was held in London, in 1912, in New York in 1922 and 1932. The 1932 Eugenics Congress made Ernst Rudin president of the International Federation of Eugenics Societies. Rudin was a Nazi, and ran Nazi eugenics work at Rockefeller's Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Human Heredity and Eugenics. So, Hitler, through Rudin, received Rockefeller funding for sterilization and euthanasia programs.

Marie Kopp American Society on Maternal Health stated that the Nazi system of sterilization was carried out in a fair manner and had been based on the California experiment that had resulted in 2500 of the first 3000 Americans being sterilized before 1924. The ERO even bragged about the Nazi laws on sterilization were worded almost exactly like Laughlin's model sterilization laws. The Nazis in turn admired him. He was given an honorary degree from the University of Heidelberg. Not many people know that the founder of IBM, Thomas J. Watson, provided the Germans with his punch card technology to use in their death camps. Those infamous numbers that were tattooed onto prisoners, were identification numbers to be fed into the IBM computers. IBM had used this technology in a study conducted in Jamaica on race mixing. It is daunting to be typing this up on a computer and realizing that computers were first invented and used for eugenics. After the war, Mengele and others were not prosecuted and some of them continued their experiments in Germany, like Otmar Von Virscher.


The chemical manufacturing company, I.G. Farben, produced Zyklon B for the Nazi gas chambers. Twenty Four of their employees designed the gas chambers and due to this were tried at Nuremberg. The charges ranged from genocide and slavery to fomenting conflict. I. G. Farben, partnered with John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil, to form a company called, Standard I.G. Farben. After the war, I.G. Farben became Hiechst A.G.

In the 20th century, all of the ideas, scientific racism, Social Darwinism, and eugenics, began to be used together effectively. The Nazis were not the first Germans to utilize concentration camps. At a place called Shark Island, in Namibia, they imprisoned, enslaved, abused and killed many black men, women and children. They rid themselves of 3500 people. This is considered the first genocide of the 20th century. People sold their skulls and heads to museums in the name of racial science and proving that Africans were inferior. Eugen Fischer went there to study the remaining people in order to prove his belief that black genetic characteristics were dominant and that race mixing was bad because it would eventually wipe out the good white genes.

What you have to keep reminding yourself is this, according to the idea of survival of the fittest, if black genes wipe out the good white genes, then the black genes are superior or the fittest. So, in effect, they saw that Darwin and Galton's ideas that superior white genes would wipe out the inferior genes of other races was wrong, and used the part of the science that was useful to them, in order to justify what they were doing. And simultaneously, they tried to distract people from realizing that they were scared to death that black genes really might be superior. But genetics really don't work that way. For instance, there are people who are black but who are able to pass for white. Who is to say, which genes are dominant and superior, they might appear white, but carry a genetic illness common to blacks. Genetics are not about appearance.

Wednesday, December 14, 2011

The Rockefellers and the One World Government, One World Religion And The Laws That Are Already In Place Against Freedom of Religion And The Noahide Laws

In 1962 Nelson Rockefeller wrote The Future of Federalism. He stated that current events demand a new world order.
 "but the nation-state is becoming less and less competent to perform its international political tasks...These are some of the reasons pressing us to lead vigorously toward the true building of a new world order...Sooner perhaps than we may realize...there will evolve the bases for a federal structure of the free world."(Nelson Rockefeller at Harvard University).

 As you read the following quotes you will see that an organized effort has been and is being made to establish a One World Government. They want to control what we believe and how we feel. They have no problem with forcing population control and brainwashing us through the media. They intend to establish a One World Religion as part of this agenda. If you have a faith that you practice this should concern you. If you are atheist or agnostic, you should not be happy at the prospect of having a religion forced upon you by government. This is not just some crackpot conspiracy theory. This is direct quotes from those involved and is now a part of documented history.

 The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization exists for the sole purpose of just such mind control.

 The first director -general of UNESCO (1946-48) was Sir Julian Huxley, an ardent defender of Darwin's evolution, and who wrote the 1948, "UNESCO: Its Purpose and Its Philosophy." He calls for the abolition of national sovereignty, the use of media propaganda to indoctrinate us, and a eugenics program.
 "The general philosophy of UNESCO should be a scientific world humanism, global in extent and evolutionary in background...its education program it can stress the ultimate need for world political unity and familiarize all peoples with the implications of the transfer of full sovereignty from separate nations to a world organization...Political unification in some sort of world government will be required...Tasks for the media division of UNESCO (will be) to promote the growth of a common outlook shared by all nations and cultures...to help the emergence of a single world culture....Even though it is quite true that any radical eugenic policy will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care, and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable." (http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0006/000681/068197eo.pdf)

 In her Universal Theocratic State, Edith Roosevelt wrote in 1962, "Curriculum is being drafted to indoctrinate our children in what "John D. Rockefeller Jr. calls 'the church of all people.'...Plans are being made to set up regional World Universities whose objectives would include 'to instruct in all religions but will not make religion it's aim,' 'build a world outlook' and teach the physiological , psychological and spiritual aspect of sex.'...

 July 31, 1962 Dwight D. Eisenhower gave his support for a World University to provide 'World Thinkers' to funnel into the United Nations....Defense Secretary Robert S. McNamara is a sponsor of the Temple of Understanding, the $5,000,000 "Spiritual UN' for the six major faiths...UN official lecture at meetings of the Arcane School, the international 'group of New World Servers', who form 'Triangles' to work for UNESCO." These were established by occultist Alice Bailey's Lucis Trust, which was to be affiliated with the U.N. Meditation Room.

 In 1969 Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary was founded, Billy Graham was Chairman Emeritus of it. Mary French Rockefeller was a trustee. Laurence Rockefeller is responsible for funding The Human Potential Foundation,based in Falls Church, Virginia, which specialises in mind control on a global scale.

 The Complimentary & Alternative Medicine Program at Stanford in partnership with Vicus.com is establishing a database of citations, abstracts and articles that were donated by one of the founders of Esalen Institute in 1997, through Laurence Rockefeller. Esalen is a freaky place.

 Everyone knows that during the Cold War both the U.S. and the Soviet Union participated in paranormal experiments. Esalen has exchanged information with them. Esalen is involved in paraspychology, self-actualization, self-hypnosis, with similar techniques of manipulation and mind-control as Tavistock. Esalen's activities include psychological manipulation to solve political problems.

 The Esalen Institute The Esalen Institute claims on their website to be associated with Aldous Huxley.

 "The Esalen Institute was founded in 1962 as an alternative educational center devoted to the exploration of what Aldous Huxley called the "human potential," the world of unrealized human capacities that lies beyond the imagination. Esalen soon became known for its blend of East/West philosophies, its experiential/didactic workshops, the steady influx of philosophers, psychologists, artists, and religious thinkers, and its breathtaking grounds blessed with natural hot springs. Once home to a Native American tribe known as the Essalen. Esalen is situated on 27 acres of spectacular Big Sur coastline with the Santa Lucia Mountains rising sharply behind."

 "We would like those people who are planning their first visit to Esalen to know that swimsuits are optional, and nudity common, in the hot springs massage area, and swimming pool. We encourage each individual to choose what is most comfortable, either wearing a swimsuit or not, and emphasize that the environment we strive for at Esalen is one of personal sanctuary and respect for the human body."

 It is interesting to note that spending time there can get you college credit. "Many formal educational institutions recognize the time spent at Esalen as being worthy of credit in their own curricula; check with your university or college. We would be glad to supply information to your school regarding any of our programs or series of programs." "Esalen is a provider of continuing education credits for nurses, psychologists, MFCCs, LCSWs, massage practitioners and bodyworkers." http://www.esalen.org/info/general.html

Aldous Huxley

 Aldous Huxley is a well known counter culture figure and he is the brother of Julian Huxley from UNESCO, mentioned above. In 1932 he wrote Brave New World, a novel which was about a future society that was collectivist (a polite word for Socialism and Communism), and the methods that this society used for control. The book turned out to be prophetic, as many of the things he wrote about are now part of our world. He also wrote screenplays for Hollywood, which means that his ideas have become part of our pop-culture. Aldous and his brother were the grandsons of T.H. Huxley, who declared himself to be Darwin’s bulldog, so strong was his support of Darwin’s theories. T.H. Huxley coined the term agnostic.

 In 1954, he published Doors of Perception, which was about drug use to expand the mind. It is said that he had himself injected with LSD when he was dying, and was high on it, when he slipped into a coma that he never awoke from. For Further Reading on the Rockefellers and Esalen, Esalen: America and the religion of no religion - Jeffrey John Kripal - 2007 and The New York Times, Sex, Drugs and Hot Tubs, 2007, http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/06/books/review/Johnson.t.html

 The American Baptist Publication Society, in 1919 published "The New World Order" by Samuel Zane Batten. Batten declares, "...the new world rises upon our vision....We have vindicated the right of social control....There must be developed a national spirit of service....The natural resources of the nation must be socialized...The state must socialize every group...Men must learn to have world patriotism. World patriotism must be a faith....There is no more justice for the claim of absolute sovereignty on the part of a nation than on the part of an individual....The only alternative is World Federation...with a world parliament, an international court, and an international policy force...Men must have an international mind before there can be a world federation. They mustsee and affirm that above the nation is humanity. Internationalism must first be a religion before it can be a reality and a system." (http://books.google.com/books/about/The_new_world_order.html?id=780LAAAAYAAJ) (http://www.infowars.com/samuel-z-batten-the-new-world-order-1919/)

 The Temple of Understanding

 John D. Rockefeller was a prominent member. The Rockefeller family funded Baptist organizations that taught more liberal theology. The Temple of Understanding collaborated with the Global Commission of Parliamentarian Leaders in 1985 and gave birth to the Global Forum. “…New Age organizations behind the Global Forum just happen to be the Temple of Understanding, which is closely tied to the United Nations and is housed at Madeleine L’Engle’s church, the Cathedral of St. John the Divine…The Temple’s purpose…is to facilitate the one world religion, through the promoting both the acceptance and the embrace of all religions, beliefs and rituals.” http://www.google.com/urlsa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CB0QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.seekgod.ca%2Frenovare.htm&ei=jn7pTvuqEoOrgweih_z6CA&usg=AFQjCNGJrDMN8tx91vA_mxIT9uDM2o80pg

 “According to the Temple of Understanding’s own literature, it is the world’s second oldest international interfaith organization, just behind the World Congress of Faith’s, founded in England in 1935…The Temple began through the efforts of …”Founding Friends,” including world leaders Eleanor Roosevelt, Albert Schweitzer, Thomas Merton, the Dalai Lama, U Thant, Pope John XXIII, Pope Paul VI…” (http://www.templeofunderstanding.org/wwa_written_history.html)

 “The “Friends” assisted the founder, Juliet Hollister...in establishing a world interfaith center based in the U.S. Additional sponsors have included John D. Rockefeller II, Margaret Sanger...International Planned Parenthood...Bishop James A. Pike...the Society of Friends(Quakers), the Jewish Theological Seminary, the Unitarian Fellowship...” http://www.seekgod.ca/rockefeller.htm

 The Rockefeller Foundation has donated to both Rand and the League for Industrial Democracy. Despite it’s name, the League is not a Democratic organization. Until 1921, it was called the Intercollegiate Socialist Society, with obvious Marxist ideology. It was organized by Upton Sinclair, Jack London, Clarence Darrow, and it’s president in 1935 was John Dewey. It has also had directors that claim to be anti-communist like Jeane Kirkpatrick and Sidney Hook. It’s headquarters was the Rand School of Social Science. http://www.seekgod.ca/rockefeller.htm

Lindisfarne Center

 The United Nations has a meditation leader named Sri Chinmoy, who said, “The United Nations is the chosen instrument of God; to be a chosen instrument means to be a divine messenger carrying the banner of God’s inner vision and outer manifestation. One day the world will... treasure and cherish the soul of the United Nations as its very own with enormous pride, for this soul is all-loving, all-nourishing, and all-fulfilling”. (http://www.srichinmoylibrary.com/books/0015/3/13)

 William Irwin Thompson is the founder of the Lindisfarne Center. He said, "We have now a new spirituality, what has been called the New Age movement. The planetization of the esoteric has been going on for some time... This is now beginning to influence concepts of politics and community in ecology... This is the Gaia [Mother Earth] politique... planetary culture.” and “the independent sovereign state, with the sovereign individual in his private property, [is] over, just as the Christian fundamentalist days are about to be over." (http://www.williamirwinthompson.org/lindisfarne/pilgrimagetolindisfarne.html)

 The Lindisfame Center is in Manhattan's Episcopal Cathedral of Saint John The Divine. It is funded by the Rockefeller Foundation, the Lilly Endowment, and the Rockefeller Brothers Fund. Maurice Stong is it's financial director and sitson the Board of Directors. He is also the director of the Aspen Institute, co-founded by Aldous Huxley. Strong is a Canadian, not an American.

 He is also:
 1.Senior Advisor to UN Secretary General Kofi Annan
2.Senior Advisor to World Bank President James Wolfensohn
3.Chairman of the Earth Council
4.Chairman of the World Resources Institute
5.Co-Chairman of the Council of the World Economic Forum member of Toyota’s International Advisory Board Strong is also a member of the Club of Rome, which is another Rockefeller created entity, which began at at the Rockefeller’s estate at Bellagio, Italy.(Coffman, Michael, Rescuing a Broken America :Why America is Deeply Divided and How to Heal it Constitutionally, 2010, pg. 115; http://books.google.com/booksid=yRg1TpgIWZAC&pg=PA115&dq=club+of+rome+rockefeller&hl=en&ei=SiTlTuqRE8fG0AHF8ZSABg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=4&ved=0CEMQ6AEwAw)

 Among the members of the Lindisfame Center is David Spangler, who said, "Lucifer, like Christ, stands at the door of man’s consciousness and knocks. If man says, “Go away because I do not like what you represent, I am afraid of you,” Lucifer will play tricks on that fellow.(Lawrence, Ronald J. The Marxist Goliath Amongst Us, 2010, pg. 232; http://books.google.com/booksid=6b21I9_RErMC&pg=PA232&dq=Lucifer,+like+Christ,+stands+at+the+door+of+man%E2%80%99s+consciousness+and+knocks&hl=en&ei=JDfNTq_BOeT50gGv1NVn&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CDoQ6AEwAQ)

 “If man says, “Come in, and I will give to you the treat of my love and understanding and I will uplift you in the light and presence of the Christ, my outflow,” then Lucifer becomes something else again. He becomes the being who carries that great treat, the ultimate treat, the light of wisdom..."

 Also housed at the Cathedral of St. John the Divine, is the Temple of Understanding. It was founded by the Lucis Trust(http://www.lucistrust.org/) connected to Alice Bailey. It is supposed to be the spiritual counterpart to the United Nations.
 It's founders include:
 John D. Rockefeller IV
then-Secretary of Defense Robert S. McNamara
Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger
IBM president Thomas J. Watson
Socialist Party leader Norman Thomas
Eleanor Roosevelt
Time-Life president James A. Linen
author Christopher Isherwood
columnist Max Lerner
entertainer Jack Benny

 It works with the UN Secretariat, The World Council of Churches, the World Conference on Religion and Peace, and the World Parliament of Religions.

 The Bahai World Faith has Maurice Strong as a member. It's international headquarters is in Haifa, Israel. It has a strong influence in the UN, which has recognized it as an international non-government organization since 1948. They were granted consultant status on he UN Economic and Social Council and UNICEF. They work with the WHO and the UN Environmental Program.

 In addition to all of his "activities", Maurice Strong has some pretty strange ideas. He and his wife bought the Colorado Land and Cattle Company, from Saudi arms dealer Adnan Khashoggi. This amounts to a tract of land that covers 200,000 acres of San Luis Valley in Colorado. They named it "Baca" and it is also known as the "Valley of the Refuge Of World Truths." The Aspen Institute and the Lindisfame Association have operations there. There are monasteries, Ashram, a Vedic Temple, and Native American shamans, a Hindu temple, a ziggurat, and a Zen Buddist center. He supposedly bought it because a mystic told him and his wife that the ranch “would become the center for a new planetary order which would evolve from the economic collapse and environmental catastrophes that would sweep the globe in the years to come.” (Bell, Larry, Climate of Corruption:Politics and Power Behind The Global Warming Hoax, 2011, pg. 101)

 On the advice of her astrologer, Shirley MacLaine decided to move there and build a New Age study center. She wrote in her book, Aging and Saging, "There are those who feel we are into the 'Shift of the Ages' . . . The shift is supposed to occur somewhere between the 1980s and through 2012 . . . I feel all of this is happening now . . . Our solar system passes through this Photon Light particles every twenty-six thousand years. Apparently we entered this belt in the early 1980s and will be going through it for a thousand years . . . The photon energy frequencies accelerate everything. They accelerate understanding, awareness, self-knowledge . . . they also accelerate confusion, chaos, anger, and negativity. I believe that is what is accelerating. We are having a healing crisis. When that crisis subsides, I believe we will begin emotionally to feel that we are all one and that we are divine as well. Because of this crisis . . . karmic issues will be resolved. We will go through a healing process which will also be extremely painful because we will be detoxing . . . ". . . in effect, every twenty-six thousand years the build up of emotional and karmic toxins is cleared. . . I call it Karma-geddon. Instead of Armageddon, a Karma-geddon will be occurring which will be the resolution of all our karmic issues down through the ages. Therefore . . . the world will shed the old ways of living . . ."

 The Baca is reportedly a hot spot for paranormal activity and UFO's.

 In 1990, West Magazine, Alberta Canada conducted an interview titled, The Wizard of the Baca Grande, he proposed writing a novel in which a group decides,
 "The rich countries won’t do it. They won’t change. So, in order to save the planet, the group decides: isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?"

 Keeping in mind that Maurice Strong is connected to the Rockefellers, we move on to the UN Conference on Environment and Development. Strong was it's Secretary General. In June of 1992, UNCED held an Earth Summit in Brazil aimed at establishing an Earth Charter. They did not succeed but Agenda 21 was adopted.

 “The real goal of the Earth Charter is that it will in fact become like the Ten Commandments.” Maurice Strong. Time Magazine did a story on the Earth Summit. The night before they paid homage to the "Female Planet, until Dawn.

 In the morning they followed a Brazilian priestest to the edge of the water on Leme Beach, where they offered flowers and fruits to the Voodoo mother goddess of the sea, whose counterpart in Western mythology is Aphrodite/Venus. The UN is supposed to be about politics, but under that guise, they are promoting a New Age, One World Religion, with a pagan basis.

 It is ironic that Strong should be associated with any Environmental organizations. According to Climate of Corruption, he intended to pipe water into the desert Southwest, but environmentalists protested. He settled with the water company for $1.2 Million dollars and retained the rights to the water. He was also caught up in the UN “Food for Oil” scandal.

 He has also been largely involved in the “green movement” and the “sustainable environment.” Strong wrote the introduction to Beyond Interdependence: The Meshing of the World's Economy and the Earth's Ecology, which was published in 1992 by the Trilateral Commission, a private organization founded by David Rockefeller, Chairman of the UN Council on Human Relations in 1973. In that introduction Strong boasts, "This book couldn't appear at a better time, with the preparation for the Earth Summit moving into gear...it will help guide decisions that will literally determine the fate of the Earth...Rio will have the political capacity to produce the basic changes needed in our international economic agendas and in our institutions of governance."

 He also said, "We may get to the point that the only way of saving the world will be for industrial civilization to collapse."(Climate of Corruption)

 The Noahide Laws

 You may not be aware that there are already laws on the books that require us to return to a time before the Ten Commandments. They are called the Noahide Laws.

 The U.S. Congress officially recognized the Noahide Laws in legislation that was passed by both houses. Congress and the President of the U. S., George Bush, indicated in Public Law 102-14, 102nd Congress, that the United States of America was founded upon the Seven Universal Laws of Noah, and that these Laws have been the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization. They also acknowledged that the Seven Laws of Noah are the foundation upon which civilization stands and that recent weakening of these principles threaten the fabric of civilized society, and that justified preoccupation in educating the Citizens of the U.S. of America and future generations is needed. For this purpose, this Public Law designated March 26, 1991 as Education Day.”

(Wheeler, Cisco, Behold a White Horse, 2009, pg. 319; http://books.google.com/books?id=ml3yrwwhXKoC&pg=PA319&lpg=PA319&dq=The+U.S.+Congress+officially+recognized+the+Noahide+Laws+in+legislation+that+was+passed+by+both+houses&source=bl&ots=lUJhU3btB&sig=229OCIufpq36kSM35_fUNseXcs&hl=en&ei=xDjNTuyeFqPv0gGCjJz6Dw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5&ved=0CDcQ6AEwBDgU)

 "This obligation, to teach all the peoples of the earth about the Laws of Noah, is incumbent upon every individual in every era" -- (Mishnah Torah, Law of Kings 8:10).

 In Israel, there is a community of people called Druze. “In January 2004, the spiritual leader of the Druze community in Israel, Sheikh Mowafak Tarif, signed a declaration calling on all non-Jews in Israel to observe the Noahide Laws as laid down in the Hebrew Bible and expounded upon in Jewish tradition. The mayor of the Galilean city of Shefa-'Amr (Shfaram) - where Muslim, Christian and Druze communities live side by side - also signed the document. The declaration includes the commitment to make a better, more humane world based on the Seven Noahide Commandments and the values they represent commanded by the Creator to all mankind through Moses on Sinai. Support for the spread of the Seven Noahide Commandments by the Druze leaders reflects the Biblical narrative itself. The Druze community reveres the non-Jewish father-in-law of Moses, Jethro, whom Arabs call Shoaib. According to the Biblical narrative, Jethro joined and assisted the Jewish people in the desert during the Exodus, accepted monotheism, but ultimately rejoined his own people. In fact, the tomb of Jethro in Tiberias is the most important religious site for the Druze community.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Laws_of_Noah

 It is debatable whether or not Jethro worshipped Yahweh. The Midianites were ordered to be destroyed by Moses. Even the male children and the women who were not virgins were ordered to be killed because they led the Israelites astray with their religion. Moses would have known whether or not his father worshipped Yahweh or some other gods. The Koran says that the Midianites were warned by the prophets to repent and that they were among the Cities of the Plain that Lot preached to, trying to get them to stop being so wicked.

 “Gentiles May Not Be Taught the Torah. Inasmuch as the Jews had their own distinct jurisdiction, it would have been unwise to reveal their laws to the Gentiles, for such knowledge might have operated against the Jews in their opponents' courts. Hence the Talmud prohibited the teaching to a Gentile of the Torah, "the inheritance of the congregation of Jacob" (Deut. xxxiii. 4). R. Johanan says of one such teaching: "Such a person deserves death" (an idiom used to express indignation). "It is like placing an obstacle before the blind" (Sanh. 59a; ‘ag. 13a). Yet if a Gentile studies the Law for the purpose of observing the moral laws of Noah, R. Meïr says he is as good as a high priest, and quotes: "Ye shall therefore keep my statutes, and my judgments, which if a man do, he shall live in them" (Lev. xviii. 5). The text does not specify an Israelite or a Levite or a priest, but simply "a man"—even a Gentile ('Ab. Zarah 26a). Resh La’ish (d. 278) said, "A Gentile observing the Sabbath deserves death" (Sanh. 58b).

 This refers to a Gentile who accepted the seven laws of the Noahide, inasmuch as "the Sabbath is a sign between God and Israel alone," and it was probably directed against the Christian Jews, who disregarded the Mosaic laws and yet at that time kept up the observance of the Jewish Sabbath.”

 “Rabbina, who lived about 150 years after the Christians had changed the day of rest to Sunday, could not quite understand the principle underlying Resh La’ish's law, and, commenting upon it, added: "not even on Mondays [is the Gentile allowed to rest]"; intimating that the mandate given to the Noahide that "day and night shall not cease" = "have no rest "should be taken in a literal sense (Gen. viii. 22)—probably to discourage general idleness (ib.Rashi), or for the more plausible reason advanced by Maimonides, who says: "The principle is, one is not permitted to make innovations in religion or to create new commandments. He has the privilege to become a true proselyte by accepting the whole Law" ("Yad," Melakim, x. 9). R. Emden, in a remarkable apology for Christianity contained in his appendix to "Seder 'Olam"(pp. 32b-34b, Hamburg, 1752), gives it as his opinion that the original intention of Jesus, and especially of Paul, was to convert only the Gentiles to the seven moral laws of Noah and to let the Jews follow the Mosaic law—which explains the apparent contradictions in the New Testament regarding the laws of Moses and the Sabbath.”

 These men are saying 1.that if you are not a Jew, you are not permitted to observe any Sabbath or Holy Day. You cannot worship on Saturday, Sunday, Monday, or any other day of the week. 2.Jesus probably never meant for Gentiles to be converted, and Jews were still supposed to observe Jewish law. 3. If you do observe any day of rest, or establish any new commandment(i.e. Christian or Muslim commandments) you should be put to death.4. You are however allowed to observe the Seven Noahide Laws, since you are unworthy of any others.

 According to the beliefs of those who follow Kabbalism, you don't need to convert to Judaism. You only need to follow the Noahide Laws.

 Anyone who knows the Bible knows that the Ten Commandments are an improvement on the Noahide Laws. In the Old Testament Law, it requires multiple witnesses in order for someone to be executed. Noahide Law requires one. If you break Noahide Law, you are supposed to be decapitated."Whoever is to be found breaking one of these laws, is subject to capital punishment by decapitation" (Sanh.57a)."“The Encyclopedia Judaica,” 1192 “...violation of any of one of the seven laws subjects the Noahide to capital punishment by decapitation.”

 These people believe that only Jews are worthy of observing the Mosaic Law, that was meant to replace the Noahide law.

 Are you getting concerned?

 Did you know that Messianic Scripture is considered to be Anti-Semitic? The reason that is important, is because there are laws against Anti-Semitism. On October 8, 2004, the Global Anti-Semitism Review Act went into effect.

 That law does not protect Christians, Muslims, Bhuddists, etc. There are scripture that say that Christ was the one who had the choice to die, and that although the Jews wronged him, he was the one with the authority and power over his life. "No one takes it from Me, but I lay it down of Myself. I have authority to lay it down, and I have authority to receive it again. This command I have received from My Father.” (John 10:18). But if you were not careful how you worded that and you implied that the Jews were responsible for Christ's death, or put too much emphasis on the scripture that says they put a curse on themselves for it, you would be in violation of this law.

 Under the Noahide Laws, Christianity is Idolatry. If you speak His name, you have Blasphemed, and should be decapitated. Stephen was stoned to death in Acts for blasphemy.

 At face value, these laws are not really wrong, but when you consider things like that the Talmud and Sanhedrin has rules in place that require you to be killed for following these rules, they take on a more sinister aspect.

 The Rambam [12th-century rabbi Maimonides]wrote, there was no Sanhedrin, and he therefore outlines the steps necessary to establish one. "When there is a majority of rabbis in Israel who authorize one person to be an authority, he can then reestablish the Sanhedrin” (Israel National News, online edition, December 9, 2004).

 “On October 13, the Sanhedrin, the highest tribunal of the Jewish state and religion, was re-inaugurated by a group of rabbis in Tiberias after 1,600 years of absence. According to Jewish sources, last notice of the Sanhedrin dates around 425 A.D., also in the city of Tiberias. After that, it ceased to exist.” (Israel National News online edition, October 13, 2004).

 “Newly Formed Sanhedrin Ascend to Temple Mount”: “In a dramatic but unpublicized move Monday, members of the newly established Sanhedrin ascended the Temple Mount.….Rabbi Chaim Richmond, also a member of the Sanhedrin (Head of the Temple Institute in Jerusalem), hopes the body will bring about a revolution in Jewish jurisprudence…the revival of the Sanhedrin is also considered a crucial development in preparation for the messianic age and the rebuilding of the Temple.” (Arutz Sheva News, December 14, 2004)(http://www.google.com/urlsa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thesanhedrin.org%2Fen%2Findex.php%3Ftitle%3DHachrazah_5765_Kislev_26&ei=eTnNTsGpFXa0QHslMFC&usg=AFQjCNGDovon9kKZU9_ya01sHToIAdqOQA&sig2=V7frRefeUo7YUku57jnXQg)

 “Sanhedrin Recognizes Council to Teach Humanity--`Laws of Noah’ ”: “A group of non-Jewish delegates have come to Jerusalem to pledge their loyalty to the Laws of Noah. They appear before the nascent Sanhedrin, which established a High Council for B’nai Noach.” (Artuz Sheva News June 9, 2006)

 Under the Genocide Treaty, if you cause bodily or mental harm to another group, your trial can be held anywhere in the world. What constitutes harm? Disagreeing with them?

 The UN established an international court system in 1993. "Were talking about creating here something that exercises genuine power, real put-people-in-jail power, but that is responsible to no one but itself." said Lee Casey, a constitutional lawyer with the Washington firm of Hunton & Williams. [Investment Business Daily, Thursday July 16, 1998 Los Angeles, California]”

 By creating the Internation Criminal Tribunal, they violated one of the UN Charter,which states that the Council has no competence whatsoever in judicial matters.

 The UN released on 16 June 2000 a press release:

 "The Rules of Procedure and Evidence cover such issues as composition and administration of the Court, penalties for crimes, obligations of international cooperation and assistance, as well as enforcement of sentences. On the matter of crimes initially within the Court’s jurisdiction -- genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity -- the Commission is working to identify what elements would constitute those crimes and would need to be proven in order to obtain convictions. In the category of crimes against humanity, it is discussing such crimes as murder, enslavement, extermination, persecution, disappearance and sexual crimes."(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Criminal_Court)

 It's not that the crimes they are considering are a problem, it's the fact that they haven't identified what constitues those crimes, and that other peoples have jurisdiction over American Courts.

 The Masonic Creed is the true basis for these laws and courts. But if we concentrate on believing that it is just Jews, we might miss the slight of hand. There was a nationwide Christian Radio address to the Council for National Policy, by James Dobson, President of Focus on the Family. He said he was determined to do whatever was necessary "to restore the observance of "moral law." "God created Wisdom before He created anything else, the Moral Law is the law of the Universe."(http://www.google.com/urlsa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=10&ved=0CGMQFjAJ&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rigorousintuition.ca%2Fboard2%2Fviewtopic.php%3Ff%3D12%26t%3D1239&ei=0DrNTvyFH4bt0gH7v7wh&usg=AFQjCNGkHD18R0o2_ZD2vY5N7KHNEEdn6Q&sig2=j_Jwix4UtC8cEBJsWlHd7g)

 "Moral law" and "moral law of the Universe" are Masonic terms. There is no specific religion mentioned, no reference to sin or even God.

 "'Christianity is totally opposite to Judaism and any mixture of the two must result in the loss of all that is vital in the present plan of Salvation. One made its appeal to the limited resources of the natural man and conditioned his life on the earth; the other sets aside the natural man, secures a whole new creation in Christ Jesus, and counsels that new being in his pilgrim journey to his heavenly home.' (Chafer, Lewis Sperry, Dr. The Kingdom in History and Prophecy, p. 64)

 The Georgia House of Representatives Bill #1274, provides for the use of guillotines.

 To amend Article 2 of Chapter 10 of Title 17 of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, relating to the death penalty generally, so as to provide a statement of legislative policy; to provide for death by guillotine; to provide for applicability; to repeal conflicting laws; and for other purposes.

 SECTION 1. The General Assembly finds that while prisoners condemned to death may wish to donate one or more of their organs for transplant, any such desire is thwarted by the fact that electrocution makes all such organs unsuitable for transplant. The intent of the General Assembly in enacting this legislation is to provide for a method of execution which is compatible with the donation of organs by a condemned prisoner.

 The following is from www.noahide.org The Institute of Noahide Code is an educational and research which encourage the practice of The Seven Laws of Noah.

 The Noahide laws are comprised of seven universal laws biblically binding upon all humanity. They include prohibitions against idolatry, blasphemy, forbidden sexual relationships including adultery and incest, murder, theft, cruelty to animals and the failure to implement orderly processes of justice. In 1991, a joint resolution of the United States congress called its principles "the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization…” without which "the edifice of civilization stands in serious peril of returning to chaos".

 The Institute draws together Rabbis, lay leaders, scholars and educators to focus on current religious thinking within Judaism and Noahide laws and provides forums for dialogue to advance greater knowledge, understanding and harmony in Judaism and the Noahide practice.

 The growing participation of dialogue is also welcomed by the Institute. As members evaluate attitudes toward the universal laws of Noah, the Institute strives to foster the exploration of the major historical, philosophical and Halakah (Jewish law) issues on the frontier of Noahide practice/dialogue as these are formulated by Rabbis/scholars at the national and international levels.

 To achieve its goals, the Institute of Noahide Code develops programs and publications to help foster the practical adherence to the seven laws of Noah. The Institute also promotes independent research and serves as a vehicle for disseminating its findings to appropriate institutions and individuals around the world.

 The Institute advertises publishes conference proceedings, lectures, monographs, and a semi-annual publication, INC Perspective, and also maintains a web site, and is a UN NGO http://www.noahide.org/, filled with a variety of articles pertaining to the Noahide concerns. Please contact us....
 There is a link at the bottom of the page that says "One People One World." Presently you don't find anything when you click on it, but obviously, they have plans.

 Lubavitch Movement

 You might notice that this website is affiliated with the Lubavitch Movement. One of the modern schools of Judaic philosophy is Chabad-Lubavitch Hasidism, which Dr. Segal(Associate Professor of Theology) describes as Kabbalist movement on his website, at the Univeristy of Calgary.

 "The name 'Chabad' is a Hebrew acronym for the expression 'Chokmah,' 'Binah" and 'Da'at' -- Wisdom, Intelligence and Knowledge. These Kabbalistic terms are central to the distinctive intellectual theology of the movement... The name Lubavitch refers to a town in Lithuania that was the centre of the movement for a brief period during the nineteenth century... Chabad Hasidism continued to be a major force among Russian and Lithuanian Jews from its inception...(http://www.google.com/urlsa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=10&ved=0CGMQFjAJ&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.angelfire.com%2Fjournal2%2Fwatch-unto-prayer%2FHRconnections.html&ei=xDvNTu2AGebh0QGC6rkN&usg=AFQjCNFmaDNcq7mSi8XtSeGwtVPZS_XgQ&sig2=b9kS7-jPsVpr5ONItQLsEg)

 "In 1940 the head of the movement Rabbi Joseph Isaac Schneerson moved to America from Russia. From the outset he expressed his determination to make the Lubavitch movement into an American religious movement (e.g., by abandoning the traditional European long frocks in favour of American-style dress)."

 Chabad-Lubovitch has an international headquarters in New York. They lobby on Capital Hill for their causes.

 It was through their machinations that the Noahide Laws were slipped past us. In 1991, Chabad-Lubavitch in cooperation with President Bush established the observance of Education Day, USA "to return the world to the moral and ethical values contained in the Seven Noahide Laws."

 Public Law 102--14 (H.J. Res. 104): March 20, 1991
 Education Day, USA Proclamation
 Joint Resolution to designate March 26, 1991 as "Education Day, USA"
 Whereas Congress recognizes the historical tradition of ethical values and principles which are the basis of civilized society and upon which our great Nation was founded;

 Whereas these ethical values and principles have been the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization, when they were known as the Seven Noahide Laws;

 Whereas without these ethical values and principles the edifice of civilization stands in serious peril of returning to chaos;

 Whereas society is profoundly concerned with the recent weakening of these principles that has resulted in crises that beleaguer and threaten the fabric of civilized society;

 Whereas the justified preoccupation with these crises must not let the citizens of this Nation lose sight of their responsibility to transmit these ethical values from our distinguished past to the generations of the future;

 Whereas the Lubavitch movement has fostered and promoted these ethical values and principles throughout the world;

 Whereas Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, leader of the Lubavitch movement, is universally respected and revered and his eighty-ninth birthday falls on March 26, 1991;

 Whereas in tribute to this great spiritual leader, "the rebbe", this, his ninetieth year will be seen as one of "education and giving", the year in which we turn to education and charity to return the world to the moral and ethical values contained in the Seven Noahide Laws;

and Whereas this will be reflected in an international scroll of honor signed by the President of the United States and other heads of state: Now, therefore be it

 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That March 26, 1991, the start of the ninetieth year of Rabbi Menachem Schneerson, leader of the worldwide Lubavitch movement, is designated as "Education Day. U.S.A.". The President is requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United States to observe such day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

 Approved March 20, 1991.

 If you were aware of anything at all going on, it was probably just National Education Day.You might have thought it had something to do with schools.

 The Noachide Laws - The Encyclopedia of Judaism
 (1) Civil justice [the duty to establish a legal system];
 (2) Prohibition of blasphemy [which includes the bearing of false witness];
 (3) The abandonment of idolatry;
 (4) The prohibition of incest [including adultery and other sexual offenses];
 (5) The prohibition of murder;
 (6) Also that of theft;
 (7) The law against eating flesh [a limb] cut from a living animal [ie., cruelty in any shape or form] (T.B. Sanh. 56A)

 Don't forget that even Christ was considered to be guilty of blasphemy. Obviously the Sanhedren doesn't consider execution to be murder.
 Remember that I previously pointed out that much of the authority for establishing a new Sanhedrin comes from Maimonides. Here is a quote from him:

 "It is a mitzvah [religious duty; ARC], however, to eradicate Jewish traitors, minnim, and apikorsim, and to cause them to descend to the pit of destruction, since they cause difficulty to the Jews and sway the people away from God, as did Jesus of Nazareth and his students, and Tzadok, Baithos, and their students. May the name of the wicked rot."

 He wrote that in the Mishnah which was the forerunner of the Torah, which is made of of the Mishnah and Rabbinical commentaries called the Gemara. Jesus condemned the Mishnah for allowing the traditions of men to make God's word null. (Mark 7:1-13)

 Know your Bible because they intend to use it against you. The Chabad Lubavitch, B'nai Noach and even some Messianic organizations say that the Noahide Laws are those given to Noah in Genesis 9 and/or the Jerusalem Council in Acts 15. Neither place in the scripture contains these 7 commandments as a code of universal law.

 Noahide is their term for us. "A bat Noach [daughter of Noah] or b'nai Noach [son/child of Noah] is a non-Jew (Noahide) who follows the Jewish laws specifically given by God for them." It is similar to Gentile.

 They intend for uneducated people to believe that the Noahide laws are part of the Ten Laws given to Moses."...the Seven Universal Laws were given on Mount Sinai at the time when the Torah was given to the Jewish people...With the Giving of the Torah, the G-d of Israel chose the descendants of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob as His Chosen People, commanding them to fulfill the 613 precepts of the Torah. He also commanded the righteous of the other nations of the world to keep the Seven Commandments of the Children of Noah and commanded Moses and his people teach them how."

 Everyone should be very concerned.